HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP vs Paexo Back
Side-by-side comparison of HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP (Cyberdyne) and Paexo Back (Ottobock) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JPJapan

- Paexo BackGermany
Year First Available
- HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP2015

- Paexo Back2020
Verified Deployments
- HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP0 Deployments

- Paexo Back0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP2 hrs

- Paexo Back—
Availability Status
- HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JPACTIVE

- Paexo BackACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP | Paexo Back |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP, Paexo Back have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP and Paexo Back?
HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP. Paexo Back is made by Ottobock, based in DE.
When were HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP and Paexo Back launched?
HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP launched in 2015. Paexo Back launched in 2020.
How do HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP and Paexo Back compare on the Robo Index?
HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP grades AA on the Robo Index. Paexo Back grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP and Paexo Back in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP and Paexo Back?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP vs Paexo Back compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.