Hubo 2 vs π0
Side-by-side comparison of Hubo 2 (KAIST) and π0 (Physical Intelligence, Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Hubo 2South Korea
- π0United States
Year First Available
- Hubo 22009
- π02023
Verified Deployments
- Hubo 20 Deployments
- π00 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Hubo 2$400,000 USD
- π0Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Hubo 21.5 hrs
- π0—
Availability Status
- Hubo 2ACTIVE
- π0ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- Hubo 245 kg
- π0—
Height
- Hubo 2125 mm
- π0—
Mobility Type
- Hubo 2bipedal
- π0—
Humanoid Subtype
- Hubo 2full bipedal
- π0other
Walking Speed
- Hubo 21.5 m/s
- π0—
Running Capable
- Hubo 2dynamic walk
- π0—
Stair Climbing
- Hubo 2No
- π0—
Terrain
- Hubo 2flat indoor
- π0industrial, agriculture, automotive, material processing, traffic, transport, sports
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Hubo 22 kg
- π0—
Total DOF
- Hubo 240
- π0—
Arm DOF
- Hubo 27
- π0—
Hand DOF
- Hubo 25
- π0—
Bimanual Coordination
- Hubo 2Yes
- π0—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Hubo 2Two PC/104 embedded computers with solid-state drives
- π0—
VLM Capable
- Hubo 2No
- π0Yes
Imitation Learning
- Hubo 2No
- π0—
Programming
- Hubo 2code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation
- π0SDK
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Hubo 21.5 hrs
- π0—
Battery Swap
- Hubo 2No
- π0—
Software
SDK Languages
- Hubo 2code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation
- π0C++
ROS Support
- Hubo 2Yes
- π0—
Open API
- Hubo 2Yes
- π0—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Hubo 2research
- π0commercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Hubo 2$400,000 USD
- π0Contact for quote
Price Tier
- Hubo 2150K+
- π0—
Pricing Model
- Hubo 2purchase
- π0—
Applications
- Hubo 2robotics education, research, service robotics, disaster response
- π0cleaning, assembly, teleoperation
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | South Korea | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $400,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 45 kg | — |
| Height (values differ) | 125 mm | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | other |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Running Capable (values differ) | dynamic walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor | industrial, agriculture, automotive, material processing, traffic, transport, sports |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 40 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 5 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Two PC/104 embedded computers with solid-state drives | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation | SDK |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation | C++ |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | research | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $400,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | robotics education, research, service robotics, disaster response | cleaning, assembly, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Foundation Models, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Hubo 2 | π0 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $400,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 96.0 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | -$150,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | -38% | — |
π0 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Hubo 2 and π0?
Hubo 2 is made by KAIST, based in KR. π0 is made by Physical Intelligence, Inc., based in US.
When were Hubo 2 and π0 launched?
Hubo 2 launched in 2009. π0 launched in 2023.
How do Hubo 2 and π0 compare on the Robo Index?
Hubo 2 grades AA on the Robo Index. π0 grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Hubo 2 and π0 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Hubo 2 and π0?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Hubo 2 vs π0 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.