Side-by-side comparison of i-Limb (Touch Bionics) and qb SoftHand Research (qb robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Availability Status

Payload Capacity

Autonomy Level

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Iceland | Italy |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2011 | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $18,000 USD | $8,625 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | — | 1.7 kg |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | partially autonomous | fully autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating
Frequently asked
i-Limb is made by Touch Bionics, based in IS. qb SoftHand Research is made by qb robotics, based in IT.
i-Limb launched in 2011. qb SoftHand Research launched in 2018.
i-Limb is listed at $18,000. qb SoftHand Research is listed at $8,625.
i-Limb scores 65/100. qb SoftHand Research scores 63/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Dexterous Hand on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss.
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
i-Limb vs qb SoftHand Research compares two robots in the dexterous-hand category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.