Skip to content

KR 16 R2010-2 vs Paloma

Side-by-side comparison of KR 16 R2010-2 (KUKA Robotics) and Paloma (Demaurex) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in
View saved

Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2Germany
  • Paloma
    Paloma

Year First Available

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-22020
  • Paloma
    Paloma2014

Verified Deployments

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-20 Deployments
  • Paloma
    Paloma0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Price

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2$26,750–$45,000 USD
  • Paloma
    Paloma$15,200 USD

Availability Status

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2ACTIVE
  • Paloma
    PalomaACTIVE

Arm Mechanics

Payload

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-216 kg
  • Paloma
    Paloma3 kg

Robot Weight

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-23 kg
  • Paloma
    Paloma8.5 kg

Reach

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-22,013 mm
  • Paloma
    Paloma

Degrees of Freedom

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-26
  • Paloma
    Paloma

Repeatability

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2±0.5 mm
  • Paloma
    Paloma

IP Rating (Arm)

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2IP65
  • Paloma
    PalomaIP54

IP Rating (Wrist)

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2IP67
  • Paloma
    Paloma

Performance

Duty Cycle

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2continuous 24 7
  • Paloma
    Paloma

Controller & Programming

Controller Model

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2KR C4
  • Paloma
    PalomaGemini 4.0

Commercial

Price (USD)

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2$26,750–$45,000 USD
  • Paloma
    Paloma$15,200 USD

Warranty

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-21 yrs
  • Paloma
    Paloma

Service Network

  • KR 16 R2010-2
    KR 16 R2010-2global
  • Paloma
    Palomaregional

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

MetricKR 16 R2010-2Paloma
Investment$35,875$15,200
Payback period8.6 mo3.6 mo
Net savings (5 yr)$214,125$234,800
ROI (5 yr)+597%+1545%

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes KR 16 R2010-2 and Paloma?

KR 16 R2010-2 is made by KUKA Robotics, based in DE. Paloma is made by Demaurex.

When were KR 16 R2010-2 and Paloma launched?

KR 16 R2010-2 launched in 2020. Paloma launched in 2014.

How do KR 16 R2010-2 and Paloma compare on the Robo Index?

KR 16 R2010-2 grades AA on the Robo Index. Paloma grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are KR 16 R2010-2 and Paloma in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between KR 16 R2010-2 and Paloma?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Get updates:

Other comparisons

About this comparison

KR 16 R2010-2 vs Paloma compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.