KR 280 R3100-2 vs Paloma
Side-by-side comparison of KR 280 R3100-2 (KUKA Robotics) and Paloma (Demaurex) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- KR 280 R3100-2Germany
- Paloma—
Year First Available
- KR 280 R3100-2—
- Paloma2014
Verified Deployments
- KR 280 R3100-20 Deployments
- Paloma0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- KR 280 R3100-2Contact for quote
- Paloma$15,200 USD
Availability Status
- KR 280 R3100-2ACTIVE
- PalomaACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- KR 280 R3100-23,100 mm
- Paloma—
Repeatability
- KR 280 R3100-2±0.08 mm
- Paloma—
Payload
- KR 280 R3100-2280 kg
- Paloma3 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- KR 280 R3100-2IP65
- PalomaIP54
Degrees of Freedom
- KR 280 R3100-26
- Paloma—
Robot Weight
- KR 280 R3100-21,687 kg
- Paloma8.5 kg
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- KR 280 R3100-2KR C5, KR C5 micro
- PalomaGemini 4.0
Commercial
Price (USD)
- KR 280 R3100-2Contact for quote
- Paloma$15,200 USD
Service Network
- KR 280 R3100-2—
- Palomaregional
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $15,200 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 3,100 mm | — |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.08 mm | — |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 280 kg | 3 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP65 | IP54 |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 1,687 kg | 8.5 kg |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | KR C5, KR C5 micro | Gemini 4.0 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $15,200 USD |
| Service Network (values differ) | — | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | KR 280 R3100-2 | Paloma |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $15,200 |
| Payback period | — | 3.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $234,800 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +1545% |
KR 280 R3100-2 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes KR 280 R3100-2 and Paloma?
KR 280 R3100-2 is made by KUKA Robotics, based in DE. Paloma is made by Demaurex.
How do KR 280 R3100-2 and Paloma compare on the Robo Index?
KR 280 R3100-2 grades A on the Robo Index. Paloma grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are KR 280 R3100-2 and Paloma in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between KR 280 R3100-2 and Paloma?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
KR 280 R3100-2 vs Paloma compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.