KR 470 PA vs Paloma
Side-by-side comparison of KR 470 PA (KUKA Robotics) and Paloma (Demaurex) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- KR 470 PAGermany
- Paloma—
Year First Available
- KR 470 PA—
- Paloma2014
Verified Deployments
- KR 470 PA0 Deployments
- Paloma0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- KR 470 PAContact for quote
- Paloma$15,200 USD
Availability Status
- KR 470 PAACTIVE
- PalomaACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
IP Rating (Arm)
- KR 470 PAIP 65
- PalomaIP54
Payload
- KR 470 PA470 kg
- Paloma3 kg
Reach
- KR 470 PA3,150 mm
- Paloma—
Degrees of Freedom
- KR 470 PA5
- Paloma—
Repeatability
- KR 470 PA±0.15 mm
- Paloma—
Robot Weight
- KR 470 PA2,331 kg
- Paloma8.5 kg
Performance
Duty Cycle
- KR 470 PAcontinuous 24 7
- Paloma—
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- KR 470 PAKR C5
- PalomaGemini 4.0
Teach Pendant Type
- KR 470 PAwired button
- Paloma—
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- KR 470 PAISO 9409-1
- Paloma—
Internal Cable Routing
- KR 470 PAthrough arm and wrist
- Paloma—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- KR 470 PAContact for quote
- Paloma$15,200 USD
Service Network
- KR 470 PAglobal
- Palomaregional
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $15,200 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | IP 65 | IP54 |
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 470 kg | 3 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 3,150 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 5 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.15 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 2,331 kg | 8.5 kg |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | continuous 24 7 | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | KR C5 | Gemini 4.0 |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | wired button | — |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1 | — |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | through arm and wrist | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $15,200 USD |
| Service Network (values differ) | global | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | KR 470 PA | Paloma |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $15,200 |
| Payback period | — | 3.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $234,800 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +1545% |
KR 470 PA has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes KR 470 PA and Paloma?
KR 470 PA is made by KUKA Robotics, based in DE. Paloma is made by Demaurex.
How do KR 470 PA and Paloma compare on the Robo Index?
KR 470 PA grades A on the Robo Index. Paloma grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are KR 470 PA and Paloma in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between KR 470 PA and Paloma?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
KR 470 PA vs Paloma compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.