Side-by-side comparison of LD (Omron Adept) and MiR500 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Payload


AMR Subtype


Length


Width


Min Aisle Width


Ground Clearance


Robot Weight


Navigation Type


Localization Accuracy


Docking Repeatability


Obstacle Detection Range


Min Object Detection Height


Pedestrian Detection


Max Speed (Loaded)


Max Speed (Unloaded)


Battery Chemistry


Runtime (Loaded)


Charging Time


Opportunity Charging


Auto Docking


Charge Cycles (Rated)


ISO 3691-4 Certified


R15.08 Certified


Safety Category


Emergency Stops


Safety LiDAR Coverage


Safety Zone Count


Fleet Size Supported


Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt


Price (USD)


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | Denmark |
| Year First Available | 2013 | 2013 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $30,000–$50,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 15 hrs | 17.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 250 kg | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype | unit load carrier | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | — | 800 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 580 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 25 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 94 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 60 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 3 mm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 1.2 m |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | — | 9.8 cm |
| Pedestrian Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 1.8 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | li ion | li ion |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | 12 hrs | 13 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 2.2 hrs | — |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking | Yes | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 3000 |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified | Yes | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified | Yes | Yes |
| Safety Category (values differ) | Cat.3 PLd | — |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 3 | 1 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 240 ° | 360 ° |
| Safety Zone Count (values differ) | 29 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Fleet Size Supported (values differ) | 100 | — |
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000–$50,000 USD | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Turning Radius, Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Battery Swap, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | LD | MiR500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $40,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 9.6 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $210,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +525% | — |
MiR500 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
LD is made by Omron Adept, based in US. MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK.
LD launched in 2013. MiR500 launched in 2013.
LD grades A on the Robo Index. MiR500 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
LD vs MiR500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.