Mōryō vs MiR500
Side-by-side comparison of Mōryō (Slip Robotics) and MiR500 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Mōryō—
- MiR500Denmark
Year First Available
- Mōryō—
- MiR5002018
Verified Deployments
- Mōryō0 Deployments
- MiR5000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Mōryō10 hrs
- MiR50017.5 hrs
Availability Status
- MōryōACTIVE
- MiR500ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- Mōryō5,443 kg
- MiR500500 kg
AMR Subtype
- Mōryōpallet mover
- MiR500unit load carrier
Length
- Mōryō700 mm
- MiR500800 mm
Width
- Mōryō590 mm
- MiR500580 mm
Turning Radius
- Mōryō0 mm
- MiR500—
Min Aisle Width
- Mōryō—
- MiR500850 mm
Ground Clearance
- Mōryō—
- MiR50025 mm
Robot Weight
- Mōryō—
- MiR50094 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- Mōryōlidar slam,vision
- MiR500other
Localization Accuracy
- Mōryō—
- MiR50060 mm
Docking Repeatability
- Mōryō—
- MiR5003 mm
Obstacle Detection Range
- Mōryō—
- MiR5001.2 m
Min Object Detection Height
- Mōryō—
- MiR5009.8 cm
Pedestrian Detection
- MōryōYes
- MiR500Yes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- Mōryōli ion nmc
- MiR500li ion
Runtime (Loaded)
- Mōryō—
- MiR50013 hrs
Opportunity Charging
- MōryōYes
- MiR500Yes
Auto Docking
- MōryōYes
- MiR500Yes
Battery Swap
- MōryōYes
- MiR500—
Charge Cycles (Rated)
- Mōryō—
- MiR5003000
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- Mōryō—
- MiR500Yes
R15.08 Certified
- Mōryō—
- MiR500Yes
Emergency Stops
- Mōryō—
- MiR5001
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- Mōryō—
- MiR500360 °
Connectivity
API Type
- Mōryōclosed
- MiR500—
OTA Updates
- MōryōYes
- MiR500—
Reliability
MTBF
- Mōryō10,000 hrs
- MiR500—
Predictive Maintenance
- MōryōYes
- MiR500—
Commercial
Pricing Models
- Mōryōraas
- MiR500—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 10 hrs | 17.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 5,443 kg | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | pallet mover | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 700 mm | 800 mm |
| Width (values differ) | 590 mm | 580 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 0 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 25 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 94 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,vision | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 60 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 3 mm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 1.2 m |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | — | 9.8 cm |
| Pedestrian Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion nmc | li ion |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 13 hrs |
| Opportunity Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Docking | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 3000 |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | closed | — |
| OTA Updates (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | 10,000 hrs | — |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Models (values differ) | raas | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, Cybersecurity Certs, Uptime SLA, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Mōryō | MiR500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Mōryō, MiR500 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Mōryō and MiR500?
Mōryō is made by Slip Robotics. MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK.
How do Mōryō and MiR500 compare on the Robo Score?
Mōryō scores 49.4 on the Robo Score. MiR500 scores 73.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Mōryō and MiR500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Mōryō and MiR500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Mōryō vs MiR500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.