Mindar vs XBot-L
Side-by-side comparison of Mindar (Kokoro) and XBot-L (Robotera) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Mindar—
- XBot-LChina
Year First Available
- Mindar2019
- XBot-L2023
Verified Deployments
- Mindar0 Deployments
- XBot-L0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Mindar$909,090 USD
- XBot-L$20,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Mindar48 hrs
- XBot-L2 hrs
Availability Status
- MindarACTIVE
- XBot-LACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Mindar195 mm
- XBot-L131 mm
Weight
- Mindar57 kg
- XBot-L65 kg
Mobility Type
- Mindarstatic
- XBot-Lbipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Mindarfull bipedal
- XBot-Lfull bipedal
Walking Speed
- Mindar—
- XBot-L4 m/s
Stair Climbing
- MindarNo
- XBot-LNo
Terrain
- Mindarindoor
- XBot-Lflat indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Mindar100 kg
- XBot-L3 kg
Total DOF
- Mindar—
- XBot-L30
Arm DOF
- Mindar—
- XBot-L7
Arm Reach
- Mindar—
- XBot-L56 cm
Bimanual Coordination
- MindarNo
- XBot-LNo
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- MindarIntel® Core™ Ultra X9 388H processor
- XBot-LRK3588 ×2
VLM Capable
- MindarNo
- XBot-LNo
Foundation Models
- Mindarfalse
- XBot-Lfalse
Imitation Learning
- MindarNo
- XBot-LNo
Programming
- Mindar—
- XBot-LOpen-source
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Mindar48 hrs
- XBot-L2 hrs
Battery Swap
- MindarNo
- XBot-LYes
Software
SDK Languages
- Mindar—
- XBot-LPython, C++
ROS Support
- MindarNo
- XBot-LNo
Open API
- MindarNo
- XBot-LYes
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Mindarcommercial
- XBot-Lcommercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Mindar$909,090 USD
- XBot-L$20,000 USD
Price Tier
- Mindar150K+
- XBot-L20-40K
Pricing Model
- Mindaroutright purchase
- XBot-L—
Applications
- Mindarreligious service, cultural education
- XBot-LDemonstrated walking on uneven terrain, climbing stairs, shadowboxing, tai chi, and waving; enhanced for unfamiliar terrains.[1][3][4][6]
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $909,090 USD | $20,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 48 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 195 mm | 131 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 57 kg | 65 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | static | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 4 m/s |
| Stair Climbing | No | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 100 kg | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 30 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 56 cm |
| Bimanual Coordination | No | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Intel® Core™ Ultra X9 388H processor | RK3588 ×2 |
| VLM Capable | No | No |
| Foundation Models | false | false |
| Imitation Learning | No | No |
| Programming (values differ) | — | Open-source |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 48 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++ |
| ROS Support | No | No |
| Open API (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | commercial | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $909,090 USD | $20,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | outright purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | religious service, cultural education | Demonstrated walking on uneven terrain, climbing stairs, shadowboxing, tai chi, and waving; enhanced for unfamiliar terrains.[1][3][4][6] |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Mindar | XBot-L |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $909,090 | $20,000 |
| Payback period | 218.2 mo | 4.8 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | -$659,090 | $230,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | -72% | +1150% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Mindar and XBot-L?
Mindar is made by Kokoro. XBot-L is made by Robotera, based in CN.
When were Mindar and XBot-L launched?
Mindar launched in 2019. XBot-L launched in 2023.
How much does Mindar cost compared to XBot-L?
Mindar is listed at $909,090. XBot-L is listed at $20,000.
How do Mindar and XBot-L compare on the Robo Score?
Mindar scores 68.0 on the Robo Score. XBot-L scores 61.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between Mindar and XBot-L?
Mindar carries up to 100 kg. XBot-L carries up to 20 kg.
Are Mindar and XBot-L in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Mindar and XBot-L?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Mindar vs XBot-L compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.