MiR100 vs Mouse/Tunnel Low
Side-by-side comparison of MiR100 (MiR) and Mouse/Tunnel Low (Bluepath Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR100Denmark
- Mouse/Tunnel LowSpain
Year First Available
- MiR1002013
- Mouse/Tunnel Low—
Verified Deployments
- MiR1000 Deployments
- Mouse/Tunnel Low0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- MiR100ACTIVE
- Mouse/Tunnel LowACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR100100 kg
- Mouse/Tunnel Low—
AMR Subtype
- MiR100unit load carrier
- Mouse/Tunnel Lowtugger
Length
- MiR100—
- Mouse/Tunnel Low1,400 mm
Width
- MiR100—
- Mouse/Tunnel Low500 mm
Robot Weight
- MiR100350 kg
- Mouse/Tunnel Low—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR100slam natural
- Mouse/Tunnel Lowvisual slam,lidar slam,other
Localization Accuracy
- MiR100—
- Mouse/Tunnel Low10 mm
Pedestrian Detection
- MiR100—
- Mouse/Tunnel LowYes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR100li ion
- Mouse/Tunnel Low—
Reliability
Predictive Maintenance
- MiR100—
- Mouse/Tunnel LowYes
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | Spain |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2013 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 100 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | tugger |
| Length (values differ) | — | 1,400 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 500 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 350 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | visual slam,lidar slam,other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 10 mm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | Yes |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR100 | Mouse/Tunnel Low |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
MiR100, Mouse/Tunnel Low have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR100 and Mouse/Tunnel Low?
MiR100 is made by MiR, based in DK. Mouse/Tunnel Low is made by Bluepath Robotics, based in ES.
How do MiR100 and Mouse/Tunnel Low compare on the Robo Index?
MiR100 grades AA on the Robo Index. Mouse/Tunnel Low grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR100 and Mouse/Tunnel Low in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR100 and Mouse/Tunnel Low?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR100 vs Mouse/Tunnel Low compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.