MiR100 vs OTTO 1200
Side-by-side comparison of MiR100 (MiR) and OTTO 1200 (OTTO Motors) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR100Denmark
- OTTO 1200Canada
Year First Available
- MiR1002013
- OTTO 12002026
Verified Deployments
- MiR1000 Deployments
- OTTO 12000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- MiR100ACTIVE
- OTTO 1200ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR100100 kg
- OTTO 12001,200 kg
AMR Subtype
- MiR100unit load carrier
- OTTO 1200unit load carrier
Length
- MiR100—
- OTTO 12001,350 mm
Width
- MiR100—
- OTTO 1200910 mm
Turning Radius
- MiR100—
- OTTO 12000 mm
Ground Clearance
- MiR100—
- OTTO 120030 mm
Robot Weight
- MiR100350 kg
- OTTO 1200—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR100slam natural
- OTTO 1200slam natural
Docking Repeatability
- MiR100—
- OTTO 120010 mm
Pedestrian Detection
- MiR100—
- OTTO 1200Yes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR100li ion
- OTTO 1200li ion
Battery Capacity
- MiR100—
- OTTO 12001 kWh
Opportunity Charging
- MiR100—
- OTTO 1200Yes
Auto Docking
- MiR100—
- OTTO 1200Yes
Charge Cycles (Rated)
- MiR100—
- OTTO 12006000
Safety
Safety Category
- MiR100—
- OTTO 1200Cat.3 PLd
Emergency Stops
- MiR100—
- OTTO 12002
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- MiR100—
- OTTO 1200360 °
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | Canada |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2013 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 100 kg | 1,200 kg |
| AMR Subtype | unit load carrier | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | — | 1,350 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 910 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 0 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 30 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 350 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | slam natural | slam natural |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 10 mm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | li ion | li ion |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 1 kWh |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 6000 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat.3 PLd |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 2 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Min Aisle Width, Localization Accuracy, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Battery Swap, ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR100 | OTTO 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
MiR100, OTTO 1200 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR100 and OTTO 1200?
MiR100 is made by MiR, based in DK. OTTO 1200 is made by OTTO Motors, based in CA.
When were MiR100 and OTTO 1200 launched?
MiR100 launched in 2013. OTTO 1200 launched in 2026.
How do MiR100 and OTTO 1200 compare on the Robo Index?
MiR100 grades AA on the Robo Index. OTTO 1200 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR100 and OTTO 1200 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR100 and OTTO 1200?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR100 vs OTTO 1200 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.