MiR500 vs Sereact Lens
Side-by-side comparison of MiR500 (MiR) and Sereact Lens (Sereact) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR500Denmark
- Sereact LensGermany
Year First Available
- MiR5002018
- Sereact Lens—
Verified Deployments
- MiR5000 Deployments
- Sereact Lens0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MiR50017.5 hrs
- Sereact Lens—
Availability Status
- MiR500ACTIVE
- Sereact LensACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR500500 kg
- Sereact Lens—
AMR Subtype
- MiR500unit load carrier
- Sereact Lens—
Length
- MiR500800 mm
- Sereact Lens—
Width
- MiR500580 mm
- Sereact Lens—
Min Aisle Width
- MiR500850 mm
- Sereact Lens—
Ground Clearance
- MiR50025 mm
- Sereact Lens—
Robot Weight
- MiR50094 kg
- Sereact Lens—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR500other
- Sereact Lens—
Localization Accuracy
- MiR50060 mm
- Sereact Lens—
Docking Repeatability
- MiR5003 mm
- Sereact Lens—
Obstacle Detection Range
- MiR5001.2 m
- Sereact Lens—
Min Object Detection Height
- MiR5009.8 cm
- Sereact Lens—
Pedestrian Detection
- MiR500Yes
- Sereact Lens—
Performance
Picks / Hour / Robot
- MiR500—
- Sereact Lens350
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR500li ion
- Sereact Lens—
Runtime (Loaded)
- MiR50013 hrs
- Sereact Lens—
Opportunity Charging
- MiR500Yes
- Sereact Lens—
Auto Docking
- MiR500Yes
- Sereact Lens—
Charge Cycles (Rated)
- MiR5003000
- Sereact Lens—
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- MiR500Yes
- Sereact Lens—
R15.08 Certified
- MiR500Yes
- Sereact Lens—
Emergency Stops
- MiR5001
- Sereact Lens—
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- MiR500360 °
- Sereact Lens—
Connectivity
WMS Integrations
- MiR500—
- Sereact Lensgeneral WMS integration (seamless integration stated)
API Type
- MiR500—
- Sereact Lensopen rest
Reliability
Uptime SLA
- MiR500—
- Sereact Lens99.9 %
Commercial
Pricing Models
- MiR500—
- Sereact Lensraas
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2018 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 17.5 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 500 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | — |
| Length (values differ) | 800 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 580 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 850 mm | — |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | 25 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 94 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | — |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 60 mm | — |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | 3 mm | — |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | 1.2 m | — |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | 9.8 cm | — |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Picks / Hour / Robot (values differ) | — | 350 |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | — |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | 13 hrs | — |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | 3000 | — |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | Yes | — |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 1 | — |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 360 ° | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| WMS Integrations (values differ) | — | general WMS integration (seamless integration stated) |
| API Type (values differ) | — | open rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Uptime SLA (values differ) | — | 99.9 % |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Models (values differ) | — | raas |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Turning Radius, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR500 | Sereact Lens |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
MiR500, Sereact Lens have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR500 and Sereact Lens?
MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK. Sereact Lens is made by Sereact, based in DE.
How do MiR500 and Sereact Lens compare on the Robo Score?
MiR500 scores 73.5 on the Robo Score. Sereact Lens scores 46.5. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR500 and Sereact Lens in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR500 and Sereact Lens?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR500 vs Sereact Lens compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.