MiR500 vs VNE 35
Side-by-side comparison of MiR500 (MiR) and VNE 35 (VisionNav) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR500Denmark

- VNE 35China

Year First Available
- MiR5002018

- VNE 35—

Verified Deployments
- MiR5000 Deployments

- VNE 350 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MiR50017.5 hrs

- VNE 35—

Availability Status
- MiR500ACTIVE

- VNE 35ACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR500500 kg

- VNE 353,500 kg

AMR Subtype
- MiR500unit load carrier

- VNE 35forklift amr

Length
- MiR500800 mm

- VNE 35—

Width
- MiR500580 mm

- VNE 351,050 mm

Turning Radius
- MiR500—

- VNE 352,240 mm

Min Aisle Width
- MiR500850 mm

- VNE 352,620 mm

Ground Clearance
- MiR50025 mm

- VNE 35—

Robot Weight
- MiR50094 kg

- VNE 35—

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR500other

- VNE 35lidar slam,vision

Localization Accuracy
- MiR50060 mm

- VNE 35—

Docking Repeatability
- MiR5003 mm

- VNE 35—

Obstacle Detection Range
- MiR5001.2 m

- VNE 35—

Min Object Detection Height
- MiR5009.8 cm

- VNE 35—

Pedestrian Detection
- MiR500Yes

- VNE 35Yes

Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- MiR500—

- VNE 350.6 m/s

Max Speed (Unloaded)
- MiR500—

- VNE 352.2 m/s

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR500li ion

- VNE 35—

Runtime (Loaded)
- MiR50013 hrs

- VNE 35—

Opportunity Charging
- MiR500Yes

- VNE 35—

Auto Docking
- MiR500Yes

- VNE 35—

Battery Swap
- MiR500—

- VNE 35Yes

Charge Cycles (Rated)
- MiR5003000

- VNE 35—

Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- MiR500Yes

- VNE 35—

R15.08 Certified
- MiR500Yes

- VNE 35—

Emergency Stops
- MiR5001

- VNE 35—

Safety LiDAR Coverage
- MiR500360 °

- VNE 35—

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2018 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 17.5 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 500 kg | 3,500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | forklift amr |
| Length (values differ) | 800 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 580 mm | 1,050 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 2,240 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 850 mm | 2,620 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | 25 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 94 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | lidar slam,vision |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 60 mm | — |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | 3 mm | — |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | 1.2 m | — |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | 9.8 cm | — |
| Pedestrian Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 0.6 m/s |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | — | 2.2 m/s |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | — |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | 13 hrs | — |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | 3000 | — |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | Yes | — |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 1 | — |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 360 ° | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR500 | VNE 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
MiR500, VNE 35 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR500 and VNE 35?
MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK. VNE 35 is made by VisionNav, based in CN.
How do MiR500 and VNE 35 compare on the Robo Score?
MiR500 scores 73.1 on the Robo Score. VNE 35 scores 52.3. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR500 and VNE 35 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR500 and VNE 35?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR500 vs VNE 35 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.