MOTOMAN HC30PL vs NexCOBOT
Side-by-side comparison of MOTOMAN HC30PL (Motoman) and NexCOBOT (NexAIoT) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MOTOMAN HC30PLJapan
- NexCOBOTTaiwan
Year First Available
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2019
- NexCOBOT2025
Verified Deployments
- MOTOMAN HC30PL0 Deployments
- NexCOBOT0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- NexCOBOTContact for quote
Availability Status
- MOTOMAN HC30PLACTIVE
- NexCOBOTACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- MOTOMAN HC30PL5 kg
- NexCOBOT—
Reach
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1,300 mm
- NexCOBOT—
Degrees of Freedom
- MOTOMAN HC30PL6
- NexCOBOT6
Repeatability
- MOTOMAN HC30PL±0.03 mm
- NexCOBOT—
Max TCP Speed
- MOTOMAN HC30PL3.1 m/s
- NexCOBOT—
Robot Weight
- MOTOMAN HC30PL140 kg
- NexCOBOT3.2 kg
Mounting Options
- MOTOMAN HC30PLfloor, ceiling, wall
- NexCOBOTwall-mounting, rail
IP Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLIP54
- NexCOBOTIP67
Safety
Safety Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO/TS 15066
- NexCOBOTCE, FCC Class A
Force/Torque Sensing
- MOTOMAN HC30PLnone
- NexCOBOT—
Duty Cycle
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- NexCOBOT24 7 continuous
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1 hrs
- NexCOBOT—
No-Code Capable
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- NexCOBOT—
Offline Programming
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- NexCOBOT—
Programming Interface
- MOTOMAN HC30PLAUBO SDK
- NexCOBOTcode_python, code_ros, proprietary_app
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO 9409-1-A50
- NexCOBOT—
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- NexCOBOTPython, C++, ROS
ROS Compatible
- MOTOMAN HC30PLNo
- NexCOBOTYes
Fieldbus Protocols
- MOTOMAN HC30PLEtherCAT
- NexCOBOTModbus TCP, MQTT
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- NexCOBOTContact for quote
Warranty
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2 yrs
- NexCOBOT—
Lead Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL4 wks
- NexCOBOT—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Taiwan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,300 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 3.1 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | 3.2 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | wall-mounting, rail |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | IP67 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | CE, FCC Class A |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | — |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | AUBO SDK | code_python, code_ros, proprietary_app |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1-A50 | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, ROS |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT | Modbus TCP, MQTT |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Lead Time (values differ) | 4 wks | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MOTOMAN HC30PL | NexCOBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $60,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 14.4 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $190,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +317% | — |
NexCOBOT has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MOTOMAN HC30PL and NexCOBOT?
MOTOMAN HC30PL is made by Motoman, based in JP. NexCOBOT is made by NexAIoT, based in TW.
When were MOTOMAN HC30PL and NexCOBOT launched?
MOTOMAN HC30PL launched in 2019. NexCOBOT launched in 2025.
How do MOTOMAN HC30PL and NexCOBOT compare on the Robo Score?
MOTOMAN HC30PL scores 74.7 on the Robo Score. NexCOBOT scores 51.9. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MOTOMAN HC30PL and NexCOBOT in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MOTOMAN HC30PL and NexCOBOT?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MOTOMAN HC30PL vs NexCOBOT compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.