OB7-Max 16 vs UR10e
Side-by-side comparison of OB7-Max 16 (Productive Robotics, LLC.) and UR10e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- OB7-Max 16United States
- UR10eDenmark
Year First Available
- OB7-Max 162025
- UR10e2008
Verified Deployments
- OB7-Max 160 Deployments
- UR10e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- OB7-Max 16Contact for quote
- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD
Availability Status
- OB7-Max 16ACTIVE
- UR10eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- OB7-Max 161,000 mm
- UR10e1,300 mm
Repeatability
- OB7-Max 16±0.1 mm
- UR10e±0.05 mm
Payload
- OB7-Max 1616 kg
- UR10e10 kg
IP Rating
- OB7-Max 16IP30
- UR10eIP54
Degrees of Freedom
- OB7-Max 167
- UR10e6
Max TCP Speed
- OB7-Max 16—
- UR10e1 m/s
Robot Weight
- OB7-Max 1658 kg
- UR10e33.5 kg
Mounting Options
- OB7-Max 16table, ceiling, wall
- UR10efloor, ceiling, wall, rail
Safety
Safety Rating
- OB7-Max 16ISO 10218-1
- UR10eCat3 PLd
Force/Torque Sensing
- OB7-Max 16none
- UR10ewrist external
Duty Cycle
- OB7-Max 16—
- UR10e24 7 continuous
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- OB7-Max 161 hrs
- UR10e—
No-Code Capable
- OB7-Max 16Yes
- UR10eYes
Offline Programming
- OB7-Max 16No
- UR10eYes
Programming Interface
- OB7-Max 16no_code_gui
- UR10eteach_pendant, no_code_gui
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- OB7-Max 16250 mm
- UR10eiso 9283
Tool Changer Support
- OB7-Max 16—
- UR10eautomatic
Integrated F/T Sensor
- OB7-Max 16—
- UR10eYes
Wrist Power Supply
- OB7-Max 16—
- UR10e24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- OB7-Max 16—
- UR10ePython, C++, URScript, .NET
Fieldbus Protocols
- OB7-Max 16Ethernet IP, TCP/IP, Modbus
- UR10eMODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet
Digital Twin Support
- OB7-Max 16—
- UR10eYes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- OB7-Max 16Contact for quote
- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1,000 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 16 kg | 10 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP30 | IP54 |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 7 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 1 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 58 kg | 33.5 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | table, ceiling, wall | floor, ceiling, wall, rail |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO 10218-1 | Cat3 PLd |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | wrist external |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | teach_pendant, no_code_gui |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | 250 mm | iso 9283 |
| Tool Changer Support (values differ) | — | automatic |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, URScript, .NET |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Ethernet IP, TCP/IP, Modbus | MODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, ROS Compatible, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | OB7-Max 16 | UR10e |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $46,153 |
| Payback period | — | 11.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $203,847 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +442% |
OB7-Max 16 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes OB7-Max 16 and UR10e?
OB7-Max 16 is made by Productive Robotics, LLC., based in US. UR10e is made by Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne), based in DK.
When were OB7-Max 16 and UR10e launched?
OB7-Max 16 launched in 2025. UR10e launched in 2008.
How do OB7-Max 16 and UR10e compare on the Robo Score?
OB7-Max 16 scores 61.3 on the Robo Score. UR10e scores 75.9. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of OB7-Max 16 compare to UR10e?
OB7-Max 16 has a reach of 1000 mm. UR10e has a reach of 1300 mm.
Are OB7-Max 16 and UR10e in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between OB7-Max 16 and UR10e?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
OB7-Max 16 vs UR10e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.