OCME LGV vs TZAGV-DM1000
Side-by-side comparison of OCME LGV (OCME) and TZAGV-DM1000 (Zhejiang Tongzhu Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- OCME LGVItaly
- TZAGV-DM1000China
Verified Deployments
- OCME LGV0 Deployments
- TZAGV-DM10000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- OCME LGVContact for quote
- TZAGV-DM1000$7,600–$11,000 USD
Availability Status
- OCME LGVACTIVE
- TZAGV-DM1000ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- OCME LGV1,500 kg
- TZAGV-DM10001,000 kg
Max Speed
- OCME LGV1.5 m/s
- TZAGV-DM10000.6 m/s
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $7,600–$11,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 1,500 kg | 1,000 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | 0.6 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | OCME LGV | TZAGV-DM1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $9,300 |
| Payback period | — | 2.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $240,700 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +2588% |
OCME LGV has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes OCME LGV and TZAGV-DM1000?
OCME LGV is made by OCME, based in IT. TZAGV-DM1000 is made by Zhejiang Tongzhu Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do OCME LGV and TZAGV-DM1000 compare on the Robo Index?
OCME LGV grades A on the Robo Index. TZAGV-DM1000 grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between OCME LGV and TZAGV-DM1000?
OCME LGV carries up to 1500 kg. TZAGV-DM1000 carries up to 1000 kg.
Are OCME LGV and TZAGV-DM1000 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Agv on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Agv robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Agv TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between OCME LGV and TZAGV-DM1000?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance
10 min readAGVs
AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in
10 min readAGVs
Running an AGV pilot: what should pass and what should fail it
9 min readAGVs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
OCME LGV vs TZAGV-DM1000 compares two robots in the agv category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.