Paloma vs UT-400
Side-by-side comparison of Paloma (Demaurex) and UT-400 (SHANDONG UNITY ROBOTICS CO., LTD.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Paloma—

- UT-400China

Year First Available
- Paloma2014

- UT-400—

Verified Deployments
- Paloma0 Deployments

- UT-4000 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Paloma$15,200 USD

- UT-400$2,000–$20,000 USD

Availability Status
- PalomaACTIVE

- UT-400ACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- Paloma8.5 kg

- UT-400130 kg

Payload
- Paloma3 kg

- UT-40015 kg

Reach
- Paloma—

- UT-4002,000 mm

Degrees of Freedom
- Paloma—

- UT-4004

Repeatability
- Paloma—

- UT-400±0.1 mm

IP Rating (Arm)
- PalomaIP54

- UT-400IP54

Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- PalomaGemini 4.0

- UT-400—

Commercial
Price (USD)
- Paloma$15,200 USD

- UT-400$2,000–$20,000 USD

Warranty
- Paloma—

- UT-4001 yrs

Service Network
- Palomaregional

- UT-400—

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $15,200 USD | $2,000–$20,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 8.5 kg | 130 kg |
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | 15 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 2,000 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.1 mm |
| IP Rating (Arm) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Gemini 4.0 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $15,200 USD | $2,000–$20,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Service Network (values differ) | regional | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Paloma | UT-400 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $15,200 | $11,000 |
| Payback period | 3.6 mo | 2.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $234,800 | $239,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1545% | +2173% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Paloma and UT-400?
Paloma is made by Demaurex. UT-400 is made by SHANDONG UNITY ROBOTICS CO., LTD., based in CN.
How do Paloma and UT-400 compare on the Robo Index?
Paloma grades AAA on the Robo Index. UT-400 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Paloma and UT-400 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Paloma and UT-400?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Paloma vs UT-400 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.