Side-by-side comparison of Potaro (Toyota Motor Corporation) and TUG (Aethon) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Payload


Compartment Type


Dimensions


Navigation Type


Max Speed


Battery Runtime


Auto Docking


Elevator API


PMS / POS Integration


Fleet Management


Floor Compatibility


Price (USD)


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $107,500 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 10 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | 453 kg |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | — | enclosed locked |
| Dimensions (values differ) | — | 1168.4x1168.4x1168.4 |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | slam natural |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 0.8 m/s |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (values differ) | — | 10 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Integration | ||
| Elevator API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| PMS / POS Integration (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fleet Management (values differ) | — | centralized cloud |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | — | hard floor,irregular concrete |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $107,500 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Robot Weight, Tray Count, IP Rating, Min Passable Width, Charge Time, Hot-Swap Battery, Display Size, Voice Interaction, Noise Level, Languages Supported, RaaS / Month, Warranty
Frequently asked
Potaro is made by Toyota Motor Corporation, based in JP. TUG is made by Aethon, based in US.
Potaro launched in 2023. TUG launched in 2022.
Potaro scores 39/100. TUG scores 39/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Potaro vs TUG compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.