QD750F vs T380AMR
Side-by-side comparison of QD750F (SIASUN) and T380AMR (Tennant) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- QD750FChina
- T380AMRUnited States
Verified Deployments
- QD750F0 Deployments
- T380AMR0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- QD750FContact for quote
- T380AMR$3,595–$107,561 USD
Availability Status
- QD750FACTIVE
- T380AMRACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Max Speed
- QD750F—
- T380AMR1.7 m/s
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $3,595–$107,561 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 1.7 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload Capacity, Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | QD750F | T380AMR |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $55,578 |
| Payback period | — | 13.3 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $194,422 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +350% |
QD750F has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes QD750F and T380AMR?
QD750F is made by SIASUN, based in CN. T380AMR is made by Tennant, based in US.
How do QD750F and T380AMR compare on the Robo Index?
QD750F grades A on the Robo Index. T380AMR grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are QD750F and T380AMR in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cleaning on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cleaning robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cleaning TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cleaning robot TCO: hardware, consumables, and human-in-the-loop time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between QD750F and T380AMR?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cleaning robot TCO: hardware, consumables, and human-in-the-loop time
8 min readCleaning Robots
Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting
10 min readCleaning Robots
Operator training: the line item most facilities skip
9 min readCleaning Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
QD750F vs T380AMR compares two robots in the cleaning category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.