Side-by-side comparison of Robonaut 2 (NASA Johnson Space Center and GM) and Unitree G1 EDU-U6 (Unitree Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Arm Reach


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Charging Method


Battery Swap


Force-Limited Arms


Fall Recovery


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Simulation Platforms


Open API


Air-Gap Capable


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Delivery Lead Time


Warranty


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2010 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $2,500,000 USD | $13,500–$73,900 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 101.6 mm | 132 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 149.7 kg | 35 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing | No | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | zero gravity | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 9 kg | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 42 | 41 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | 7 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 45 cm |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | Yes | coordinated planning |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | vendor demo |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 38 PowerPC processors | 100 TOPS |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Jetson Orin |
| VLM Capable | No | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | UnifoLM |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | vr_headset |
| Programming (values differ) | teleoperated | imitation & reinforcement learning |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | software_defined |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | teleoperated | Python, C++, ROS2 |
| ROS Support (values differ) | No | ros2 vendor |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Isaac Sim |
| Open API (values differ) | No | open rest |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | commercial | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $2,500,000 USD | $13,500–$73,900 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | outright purchase | capex |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 2 mo |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | space_exploration, automotive_manufacturing, hazardous_env, medical_assistance | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
Robonaut 2 is made by NASA Johnson Space Center and GM, based in US. Unitree G1 EDU-U6 is made by Unitree Robotics, based in CN.
Robonaut 2 grades AA on the Robo Index. Unitree G1 EDU-U6 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Robonaut 2 carries up to 9 kg. Unitree G1 EDU-U6 carries up to 3 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Robonaut 2 vs Unitree G1 EDU-U6 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.