TM16M vs UR10e
Side-by-side comparison of TM16M (Techman Robot Inc.) and UR10e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- TM16MTaiwan
- UR10eDenmark
Year First Available
- TM16M2016
- UR10e2008
Verified Deployments
- TM16M0 Deployments
- UR10e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- TM16MContact for quote
- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD
Availability Status
- TM16MACTIVE
- UR10eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Repeatability
- TM16M±0.1 mm
- UR10e±0.05 mm
IP Rating
- TM16MIP54
- UR10eIP54
Reach
- TM16M1,300 mm
- UR10e1,300 mm
Payload
- TM16M16 kg
- UR10e10 kg
Degrees of Freedom
- TM16M6
- UR10e6
Max TCP Speed
- TM16M1.3 m/s
- UR10e1 m/s
Robot Weight
- TM16M32.8 kg
- UR10e33.5 kg
Mounting Options
- TM16M—
- UR10efloor, ceiling, wall, rail
Safety
Safety Rating
- TM16MCE (by regional model), SEMI S2 (optional)
- UR10eCat3 PLd
Force/Torque Sensing
- TM16Mnone
- UR10ewrist external
Duty Cycle
- TM16M—
- UR10e24 7 continuous
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- TM16MYes
- UR10eYes
Offline Programming
- TM16MNo
- UR10eYes
Programming Interface
- TM16MTMflow, flowchart base
- UR10eteach_pendant, no_code_gui
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- TM16M—
- UR10eiso 9283
Tool Changer Support
- TM16M—
- UR10eautomatic
Integrated F/T Sensor
- TM16M—
- UR10eYes
Wrist Power Supply
- TM16M—
- UR10e24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- TM16M—
- UR10ePython, C++, URScript, .NET
Fieldbus Protocols
- TM16MModbus TCP/RTU, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP
- UR10eMODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet
Digital Twin Support
- TM16M—
- UR10eYes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- TM16MContact for quote
- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Taiwan | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) | 1,300 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Payload (values differ) | 16 kg | 10 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.3 m/s | 1 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 32.8 kg | 33.5 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor, ceiling, wall, rail |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE (by regional model), SEMI S2 (optional) | Cat3 PLd |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | wrist external |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | TMflow, flowchart base | teach_pendant, no_code_gui |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 |
| Tool Changer Support (values differ) | — | automatic |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, URScript, .NET |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Modbus TCP/RTU, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP | MODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, ROS Compatible, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | TM16M | UR10e |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $46,153 |
| Payback period | — | 11.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $203,847 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +442% |
TM16M has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes TM16M and UR10e?
TM16M is made by Techman Robot Inc., based in TW. UR10e is made by Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne), based in DK.
When were TM16M and UR10e launched?
TM16M launched in 2016. UR10e launched in 2008.
How do TM16M and UR10e compare on the Robo Score?
TM16M scores 66.4 on the Robo Score. UR10e scores 75.9. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of TM16M compare to UR10e?
TM16M has a reach of 917 mm. UR10e has a reach of 1300 mm.
Are TM16M and UR10e in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between TM16M and UR10e?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
TM16M vs UR10e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.