Side-by-side comparison of TORO (German Aerospace Center (DLR)) and Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Weight


Height


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Onboard Compute


Programming


Runtime


Force-Limited Arms


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Warranty


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2013 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $65,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 1 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 76 kg | 60 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 174 mm | 1720 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | research platform | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.5 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | dynamic walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | demo only | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, mild_incline | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 39 | 21 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 6 | 4 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Two Intel Core i7 computers in torso, one Intel Core i3 computer in the head | 275 TOPS |
| Programming (values differ) | — | ROS2 |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | ROS2 |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $65,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly, research | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
TORO is made by German Aerospace Center (DLR), based in DE. Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision is made by UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd., based in CN.
TORO scores 28/100. Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision scores 33/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
TORO vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.