Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: DURING A DIAGNOSTIC MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY, THE PHYSICIAN BIOPSIED SAMPLES AT THE RIGHT UPPER LOBE (RUL) 3CM FROM THE TARGET. AS THE PHYSICIAN REPOSITIONED THE BRONCHOSCOPE, A ROBOTIC ARM FAULT STATE OCCURRED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO GET ALL OF HIS BIOPSIES DUE TO THIS FAULT CONDITION AND ELECTED TO ABORT THE CASE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SYSTEM ISSUES.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PNEUMOTHORAX MEDIASTINAL. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED DUE TO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES, FOR OBSERVATION ONLY UNRELATED TO MONARCH DEVICE. THERE WERE NO FAULTS OR ISSUES REPORTED WITH THE MONARCH SYSTEM AND THE PHYSICIAN IS NOT ATTRIBUTING THE EVENT TO THE MONARCH.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: PROCEDURE WAS A L3-5 OPEN/MIDLINE RIGHT TLIF USING A PRE-OP CT WORKFLOW. 9' FLOURO FIXTURE WAS USED WITH A OEC 9900 ELITE C ARM. SURGEON IDENTIFIED A MEDIAL BREACH OF THE RIGHT L3 SCREW.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SCREW USING THE EXCELSIUS GPS SYSTEM WAS MISPLACED INTRA-OPERATIVELY CAUSING A CSF (CEREBRAL SPINAL FLUID) LEAK.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT SCREWS USING THE EXCELSIUS GPS SYSTEM WERE MISPLACED INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND THEN REMOVED AND REPLACED.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DIAGNOSTIC MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY WHILE DRIVING THROUGH THE BRONCHIAL ANATOMY TO THE TARGET LOCATION IN THE RIGHT UPPER LOBE (RUL). THE PATIENT ANATOMY REQUIRED THE BRONCHOSCOPE TO MANEUVER THROUGH A DIFFICULT/TIGHT SHARP TURN. THE MONARCH SYSTEM PRODUCED MULTIPLE FAULT CODES. THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO REACH THE TARGET AND ELECTED TO ABORT THE DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SYSTEM ISSUES.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT SCREWS USING THE EXCELSIUS GPS SYSTEM WERE MISPLACED INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND THEN REMOVED AND REPLACED.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: AFTER MAKING TRACKS IN L4-R, L3-R, L2-R AND L1-R, SURGEON WAS ABOUT TO USE BUR IN T12-R AND HE OBSERVED THAT THE BUR POSITION IS NOT RIGHT AS PER THE ANATOMY AND THE PLANNED TRAJECTORY WHILE THE POSITIONING OF THE ARM WAS GOOD ON THE SCREEN. WE ASKED SURGEON TO CHECK THE ACCURACY BY USING AN INSTRUMENT AND T10-T12 LEVELS WERE NOT ACCURATE WHILE THE LUMBER AREA WAS ACCURATE. THERE WAS NOT ANY DRB/SURVEILLANCE SHIFT WARNING ON THE SYSTEM.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: HELLO, THIS IS CONCERNING A DEFECTIVE MEDICAL DEVICE. THE DEVICE: THE MONARCH. MY PULMONOLOGIST USED IT AS HE HAD DONE WITH THE OTHER 300 PATIENTS BEFORE ME, TO PLACE A MARKER IN MY LUNG. I HAVE A POSSIBLE MALIGNANT NODULE. THE SURGEON WENT IN TO TAKE OUT THE NODULE BUT COULD NOT FIND IT. THE MARKER WAS IN THE WRONG PLACE!!! MY PULMONOLOGIST CALLED MONARCH BUT GOT NOWHERE. HE DID FIND OUT THEY HAD RECENTLY DID A SOFTWARE UPDATE. SOMETHING WAS DEFECTIVE IN THE MONARCH DEVICE USED. MY DOCTOR PUT IN A COMPLAINT WITH THE FDA. ANOTHER PROVIDER AT THE LUNG CLINIC, ALSO HAD A MALFUNCTION WITH THE MONARCH ON A RECENT PATIENT. HE ALSO REPORTED TO THE FDA. MY PULMONOLOGIST AND IS GROUP WILL BE TALKING WITH THE HOSPITAL ABOUT THIS DEVICE AND IF THEY SHOULD CONTINUE TO USE IT OR CHANGE TO SOMETHING ELSE. THE MONARCH MALFUNCTION HAS DERAILED EVERYTHING WITH MY CARE REGARDING GETTING THIS NODULE REMOVED. I HAVE SO MUCH INFLAMMATION SINCE THE SURGERY THAT I MUST WAIT UNTIL JUNE FOR ANOTHER CT (COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY) TO CHECK ON THE NODULE. OVER (B)(6) IN DOCTOR BILLS AND A SURGERY THAT I SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD BECAUSE OF THE DEFECT. **PROCEDURE OCCURRED AT (B)(6) OPERATING ROOM. THANK YOU, (B)(6). I H

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IN BETWEEN CASES SYSTEM FLAGGED ANOTHER "BUMP ERROR", THIS HAS HAPPENED 2 DAYS AFTER THE SITE HAD ANOTHER BUMP ERROR. THIS WAS RESOLVED VIA ACCURACY TEST PASS. SITE HAVE BEEN VIGILANT AND ASSURED ME THAT NO-ONE HAD IMPACTED THE CAMERA AND THE WARNING RANDOMLY APPEARED WHEN PREPPING FOR THE SECOND CASE.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: DURING THE CLINICAL STUDY TRIAL CASE UNEXPECTED VIDEO QUALITY WAS OBSERVED ON URETEROSCOPE. THE UNEXPECTED VIDEO QUALITY CONSISTED OF BLURRINESS ON THE SYSTEM DISPLAY. THE BLURRY VISION WAS ONLY OBSERVED DURING MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL) PROCEDURE OF THE PRODUCT WORKFLOW, NAMELY DURING URETEROSCOPE DRIVING WITH THE LASER DRIVER COMPONENT CONNECTED. UPON REPLACEMENT OF THE URETEROSCOPE, NO FURTHER VIDEO ISSUES WERE OBSERVED AND THE USER COMPLETED THE CASE. UNDER PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION THE URETEROSCOPE WAS EXAMINED UNDER MAGNIFICATION, AT WHICH TIME IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE TOP LAYER OF THE CAMERA LENS WAS MISSING. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SYSTEM ISSUES.

VELYS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY SURGICAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT WHILE USING THE ROBOTIC-ASSISTED SOLUTION SATELLITE STATION DEVICE IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE ANTERIOR CUT WAS OFF. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE ROBOTIC ASSISTED BASE STATION DEVICE WAS TAKING A LONG TIME TO BOOT UP AND THE POWER CORD WOULD NOT STAY SECURELY ATTACHED TO THE BASE STATION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SYSTEM WAS WORKING HOWEVER THE POWER CORD IS CAUSING FRUSTRATION WITH THE SYSTEM SHUTTING DOWN. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THERE WERE NO INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A LUMBAR FUSION WITH SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION USING COMPUTER NAVIGATION AND ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE USING THE GLOBUS MEDICAL EXCELSIUS 3D IMAGING SYSTEM. I HAD BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE GLOBUS REPRESENTATIVE ON THE MORNING OF SURGERY THAT THERE WAS A POTENTIAL PROBLEM WITH THE BATTERY SUPPLY OF THE GLOBUS IMAGING SYSTEM BUT THAT IT HAD BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE ENGINEERS AND THERE SHOULD BE NO PROBLEM. I WAS TOLD THAT EVEN IF THERE WAS A BATTERY ISSUE THE SYSTEM COULD RUN FROM ELECTRICAL POWER FROM THE WALL. ONCE THE PATIENT WAS ASLEEP AND THE EXPOSURE TO THE SPINE WAS COMPLETE, THE GLOBUS IMAGING SYSTEM WAS BROUGHT IN FOR OBTAINING THE IMAGES. IT IMMEDIATELY SHUT DOWN AND COULD NOT BE RESTARTED. AS A RESULT I WAS UNABLE TO PROCEED WITH THE COMPUTER NAVIGATION OR ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE THAT I HAD EXPLAINED TO THE PATIENT. MY OPTIONS WERE TO EITHER CANCEL THE SURGERY AND CLOSE THE WOUND TO RETURN ANOTHER DAY ONCE THE SYSTEM WAS WORKING OR PROCEED WITHOUT THE NAVIGATION AND ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE. I CHOOSE TO PROCEED WITH THE SURGERY USING THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH WITHOUT NAVIGATION OR ROBOTICS. FORTUNATELY THE SURGERY WENT WELL WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. I WAS ABLE TO CONTINUE WIT

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A LUMBAR FUSION WITH SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION USING COMPUTER NAVIGATION AND ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE USING THE GLOBUS MEDICAL EXCELSIUS 3D IMAGING SYSTEM. I HAD BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE GLOBUS REPRESENTATIVE ON THE MORNING OF SURGERY THAT THERE WAS A POTENTIAL PROBLEM WITH THE BATTERY SUPPLY OF THE GLOBUS IMAGING SYSTEM BUT THAT IT HAD BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE ENGINEERS AND THERE SHOULD BE NO PROBLEM. I WAS TOLD THAT EVEN IF THERE WAS A BATTERY ISSUE THE SYSTEM COULD RUN FROM ELECTRICAL POWER FROM THE WALL. ONCE THE PATIENT WAS ASLEEP AND THE EXPOSURE TO THE SPINE WAS COMPLETE, THE GLOBUS IMAGING SYSTEM WAS BROUGHT IN FOR OBTAINING THE IMAGES. IT IMMEDIATELY SHUT DOWN AND COULD NOT BE RESTARTED. AS A RESULT I WAS UNABLE TO PROCEED WITH THE COMPUTER NAVIGATION OR ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE THAT I HAD EXPLAINED TO THE PATIENT. MY OPTIONS WERE TO EITHER CANCEL THE SURGERY AND CLOSE THE WOUND TO RETURN ANOTHER DAY ONCE THE SYSTEM WAS WORKING OR PROCEED WITHOUT THE NAVIGATION AND ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE. I CHOOSE TO PROCEED WITH THE SURGERY USING THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH WITHOUT NAVIGATION OR ROBOTICS. FORTUNATELY THE SURGERY WENT WELL WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. I WAS ABLE TO CONTINUE WIT

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A LUMBAR FUSION WITH SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION USING COMPUTER NAVIGATION AND ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE USING THE GLOBUS MEDICAL EXCELSIUS 3D IMAGING SYSTEM. I HAD BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE GLOBUS REPRESENTATIVE ON THE MORNING OF SURGERY THAT THERE WAS A POTENTIAL PROBLEM WITH THE BATTERY SUPPLY OF THE GLOBUS IMAGING SYSTEM BUT THAT IT HAD BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE ENGINEERS AND THERE SHOULD BE NO PROBLEM. I WAS TOLD THAT EVEN IF THERE WAS A BATTERY ISSUE THE SYSTEM COULD RUN FROM ELECTRICAL POWER FROM THE WALL. ONCE THE PATIENT WAS ASLEEP AND THE EXPOSURE TO THE SPINE WAS COMPLETE, THE GLOBUS IMAGING SYSTEM WAS BROUGHT IN FOR OBTAINING THE IMAGES. IT IMMEDIATELY SHUT DOWN AND COULD NOT BE RESTARTED. AS A RESULT I WAS UNABLE TO PROCEED WITH THE COMPUTER NAVIGATION OR ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE THAT I HAD EXPLAINED TO THE PATIENT. MY OPTIONS WERE TO EITHER CANCEL THE SURGERY AND CLOSE THE WOUND TO RETURN ANOTHER DAY ONCE THE SYSTEM WAS WORKING OR PROCEED WITHOUT THE NAVIGATION AND ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE. I CHOOSE TO PROCEED WITH THE SURGERY USING THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH WITHOUT NAVIGATION OR ROBOTICS. FORTUNATELY THE SURGERY WENT WELL WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. I WAS ABLE TO CONTINUE WIT

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: THERE IS A RED LIGHT ON THE ROBOT, AND THE SYSTEM CAMERA REPORTED BING BUMPED.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT SCREWS USING THE EXCELSIUS GPS SYSTEM WERE MISPLACED INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND THEN REMOVED AND REPLACED.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS NEEDED TO REMOVE AND REPLACE MISPLACED SCREWS THAT WERE PLACED USING THE EXCELSIUS GPS SYSTEM DUE TO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: DR. (B)(6) WAS DOING A T3-T12 PEDIATRIC SCOLIOSIS PATIENT. SIGNIFICANT CORONAL AND SAGITTAL DEFORMITY AT MULTIPLE LEVELS. WE WERE USING A 12INCH C-ARM. MERGE FAILED AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS OF HAVING THE X-RAY TECH WAG THE C-ARM IN LATERAL, RAINBOW IN A/P, AND TRY OBLIQUE IN LATERAL AT HIGH LEVELS. TRIED MULTIPLE LATERALS AND A/P WITH NO AVAIL. SURGEON WAS VERY PATIENT AND GAVE US THE TIME BUT EVENTUALLY BAILED ON THE ROBOT. HE PROCEEDED WITH DOING THE CASE FREE HAND.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PNEUMOTHORAX IN THE RIGHT LUNG. A CHEST TUBE WAS PLACED AND PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED. THE FOLLOWING DAY THE CHEST TUBE WAS REMOVED AND THE PATIENT WAS RELEASED. THE PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THE SCOPE APPEARED TO BE KINKED AND THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO ABORT THE CASE.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT REPORTED THAT THE NAVIGATION WAS NOT MATCHING UP WITH THE CIOS SPIN AND WAS ~30MM OFF FROM THE TARGET BUT THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. A PNEUMOTHORAX WAS DISCOVERED POST-OP AND THE PATIENT WAS NOT ADMITTED BUT A CHEST TUBE WAS PLACED. CHEST TUBE WAS REMOVED SAME DAY AND THE PATIENT WENT HOME SAME DAY. THERE WERE NO FAULTS OR ISSUES REPORTED WITH THE MONARCH SYSTEM AND THE PHYSICIAN IS NOT ATTRIBUTING THE EVENT TO THE MONARCH.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT SCREWS USING THE EXCELSIUS GPS SYSTEM WERE MISPLACED INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND THEN REMOVED AND REPLACED.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: THE MERGE OF L4-5 LEVELS FOR SINGLE POSITION LATERAL SURGERY SHOWED A SHIFT. WE TOOK NEW SHOTS OF EACH INDIVIDUAL LEVEL AND ADDED L3 AND S1 TO HELP WITH THE MERGE. THE SURGEON WAS UNHAPPY WITH THE MERGE AS THERE WAS SLIGHT MOVEMENT VISIBLE ON THE L4 AND L5 A/P AND LATERAL VIEWS. THE SINGLE POSITION LATERAL CASE WAS ABORTED AND CONVERTED TO AN OPEN PRONE TLIF. PLEASE NOTE THE BED WAS ADJUSTED TO HELP ACCOMMODATE THE ILIAC CREST PRIOR TO ROBOTIC X RAYS BEING TAKEN.

VELYS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN VERIFYING THE CUTS ON THE FEMUR, IT APPEARED THAT THE LATERAL POSTERIOR CUT HAD BEEN OVER RESECTED BY 1MM WHEN USING VELYS. WHEN SURGEON PUT TRIALS ON, HE NOTICED CONSIDERABLE 1-2MM GAPS BETWEEN BONE AND TRIAL FEMUR FOR THE: POSTERIOR, ANTERIOR, ANTERIOR CHAMFER AND DISTAL. LEFT TKR USING VELYS ATTUNE PS FB CONSTRUCT.