Find a safety record
Every incident, injury and recall on file, from the national registries that publish them. Search a maker, a model, a town or a reference number — or narrow by what happened. Each record is the registry's own text, reproduced without rewriting, with the reference that locates it at the source. Registries count different things, so a total is a count of FILINGS and never a measure of how dangerous something is. How the record was collected.
Or jump to a maker
645 records match
10 death reports20258 registriesClear
Narrow it down
What happened
Country
Year
Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-12062Passenger Car · struck on the rear · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 1
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Passing
- CP Contact Area
- Front Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 9:07 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwestbound in the rightmost lane on [XXX] with its right turn signal activated when it began slowing in-lane for a passenger pick-up. While the Waymo AV was slowing, a passenger car that was traveling directly behind the Waymo AV attempted to pass the Waymo AV on the left and the front right side of the passenger car made contact with the rear left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-12062WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoLos Angeles30270-11882SUV · struck on the rear · stopped
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 2:25 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound on a narrow portion of [XXX] with vehicles parked on both sides when it came to a stop to yield to an SUV traveling westbound on [XXX]. As the SUV passed the stationary Waymo AV, the left side of the SUV made contact with the rear left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The SUV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11882WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoAustin30270-11991Pickup Truck · struck on the front · changing lanes
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Changing Lanes
- SV Contact Area
- Front
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 1
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Cloudy
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 5:38 PM CT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound in the left of two lanes on [XXX] in autonomous mode when it came to a stop in a queue of traffic at the intersection with [XXX]. Leading up to the intersection, a queue of traffic had formed on the left shoulder to enter the dedicated left turn lane at the intersection. The Waymo AV began to initiate a lane change to the designated left turn lane at the point at which that lane began, and came to a stop next to a pickup truck that was stationary, positioned partially in the left shoulder and partially at the entrance to the dedicated left turn lane. As traffic began to advance, the Waymo AV began to proceed forward at a low rate of speed to continue changing lanes. The test driver of the Waymo AV transitioned the Waymo AV to manual mode and began to brake as the pickup truck proceeded forward into the dedicated left turn lane, and the right side of the pickup truck made contact with the front left of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11991WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAAvrideAustin31101-13154SUV · struck on the rear · stopped
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Exiting ODD
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Intersection
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- HYUNDAI
- Model
- Ioniq 5
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
Our vehicle was yielding to oncoming traffic before merging from the [XXX] service road onto [XXX] when it was rear-ended by a Honda Pilot.
cause not established31101-13154AvrideSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAZooxLas Vegas30610-13123Pickup Truck · struck on the rear right · making right turn
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Right Turn
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Right Turn
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- None
- Make
- ZOOX
- Model
- Zoox
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
An occupied Zoox autonomous vehicle, southbound on [XXX], was gradually slowing and yielding to cross traffic in preparation for making a right turn at a traffic signal onto [XXX] in Las Vegas, when it was rear ended by a pickup (Vehicle 2) traveling directly behind. The Zoox vehicle came to a stop after the collision. The driver of Vehicle 2 initially exited their vehicle to check the vehicle, then completed the turn, stopped, and then exited their vehicle again to inspect for damage, signaling a "thumbs-up" to the Zoox rider. Vehicle 2 driver did not remain on scene to exchange information. The Zoox vehicle resumed operation and returned to base, where it was found to have sustained minor damage. There were no reported injuries. Camera footage from the Zoox vehicle shows that the Vehicle 2 driver was not looking ahead at the roadway before the time of contact.
cause not established30610-13123ZooxSource file ↗Minor injury2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-12050Non-Motorist: Cyclist · struck on the rear right · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Non-Motorist: Cyclist
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Minor W/ Hospitalization
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 11
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- San Francisco Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 4:05 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a cyclist on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling north in the leftmost lane of [XXX] approaching the intersection with [XXX] when it started braking for stopped traffic ahead and, subsequently, in preparation for a lane change maneuver. A cyclist following the Waymo AV in the leftmost lane at a close distance on an electric assist bicycle then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. The cyclist remained upright and the bicycle fell to the roadway behind the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Waymo is not aware of any damage to the bicycle nor the Waymo AV at this time. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because an individual involved was transported from the scene to a hospital for medical treatment. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-12050WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoAustin30270-11932SUV · struck on the front · stopped
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Front
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Backing
- CP Contact Area
- Rear Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Parking Lot
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 11:09 AM CT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving an SUV in the parking lot at [XXX]. In the parking lot at [XXX], the Waymo AV was proceeding slowly behind an SUV traveling northbound. The SUV then came to a stop facing north, and the Waymo AV came to a stop to yield to the stopped SUV. While the Waymo AV remained stopped, the SUV reversed and the rear of the SUV made contact with the front of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11932WaymoSource file ↗Minor injury2025-10NHTSAWaymoLos Angeles30270-13053Passenger Car · struck on the front · stopped
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Minor W/O Hospitalization
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Front
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Backing
- CP Contact Area
- Rear Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Parking Lot
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 3:33 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a passenger car in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound in a parking lot at [XXX] when it slowed to a stop to yield to a passenger car stopped in-lane. While the Waymo AV was stopped, the passenger car reversed and the rear right side of the passenger car made contact with the front left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. The passenger in the Waymo AV reported a minor injury. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-13053WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoMountain View30270-11962Pickup Truck · struck on the rear right · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 2
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Cloudy
- Investigating Agency
- Mountain View Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 8:53 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Mountain View, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing southeast in the rightmost lane on [XXX] in a queue of traffic for a red light at the intersection at [XXX]. After the traffic light turned green, the Waymo AV proceeded a short distance forward before coming to a stop to yield to the stationary SUV directly in front of the Waymo AV. As the Waymo AV came to a stop, a pickup truck that was initially stopped directly behind the Waymo AV began to proceed forward. The Waymo AV then began to proceed forward again after the SUV ahead proceeded forward, and the front of the pickup truck then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11962WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoSanta Monica30270-11907SUV · struck on the rear left · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Left
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 24
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Left Turn
- CP Contact Area
- Front Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 1:20 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northwestbound on [XXX]. Ahead of the Waymo AV, an SUV was stopped facing southwest, partially within the exit of a parking lot for [XXX] and partially within northwestbound [XXX] designated bicycle lane. As the Waymo AV passed the SUV, the SUV began to move forward and entered the Waymo AV's lane of travel, and the front right side of the SUV made contact with the rear right side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11907WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoPhoenix30270-11838Pickup Truck · struck on the rear right · stopped
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 9:37 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound on [XXX] when it began to slow to a stop to yield to an animal that ran into the roadway from in front of a parked car on the south side of [XXX]. As the Waymo AV slowed to a stop, a pickup truck that was traveling eastbound on [XXX] behind the Waymo AV approached the Waymo AV from behind and the front of the pickup truck made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11838WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoLos Angeles30270-12007Heavy Truck · struck on the rear left · stopped
- Crash With
- Heavy Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Left
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Left Turn
- CP Contact Area
- Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 4:00 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing northwest in the rightmost lane on [XXX] for a red light at the intersection with [XXX] with its right turn signal activated. After cross traffic on [XXX] cleared, the Waymo AV proceeded to make a right turn onto [XXX]. While the Waymo AV was turning, a heavy truck that was initially stopped facing southeast on [XXX] in the designated left turn lane proceeded into the intersection to make a left turn onto [XXX]. After completing the right turn, the Waymo AV came to a stop in the second from the right lane for a queue of traffic. The heavy truck continued to turn left into the rightmost lane on [XXX], a designated bus lane, and the left side of the heavy truck made contact with the rear right side of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-12007WaymoSource file ↗No injury reported2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-12070Animal · struck on the rear left · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Animal
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Left
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 5
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Other, see Narrative
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 11:40 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California made contact with a cat on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped next to the curb for a passenger pickup facing east on [XXX]. As the passengers were boarding the Waymo AV, a cat approached the Waymo AV from the southern sidewalk of [XXX] and sat in the roadway partially under the front right corner of the Waymo AV. A pedestrian approached the Waymo AV from the east on the southern sidewalk of [XXX] and began crouching near the front of the Waymo AV, stepping partially into the roadway, appearing to reach for the cat. As they did so, the cat moved farther from the sidewalk under the Waymo AV and the pedestrian stepped back onto the sidewalk. The Waymo AV then departed the pickup location and the rear right tire made contact with the cat. At the time of impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Waymo later received notice that the cat did not survive. The passengers in the Waymo AV did not have seatbelts fastened at the time, having just boarded the Waymo AV. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-12070WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSATeslaAustin13781-11986struck on the right · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Other, see Narrative
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 18
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Other, see Narrative
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Partly Cloudy
- Investigating Agency
- None
- Make
- TESLA
- Model
- Model Y
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
Summary: This updated report does not report a new incident or make any material changes to the factual record. It only removes confidential or personally identifying information to make the incident narrative publicly available. The Tesla ADS made a left turn onto a residential street. As the ADS passed a residential house, with a dump trailer parked in the driveway and the trailer's gooseneck hitch sticking out into the street, the ADS's side mirror made contact with the gooseneck hitch. Safety monitor was present and no passengers were inside the vehicle.
cause not established13781-11986TeslaSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoPhoenix30270-11960Passenger Car · struck on the left · stopped
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Left
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Passing
- CP Contact Area
- Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Parking Lot
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 5:51 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV came to a stop facing east in a parking lot at [XXX] for a passenger drop-off. While the Waymo AV was stopped, a passenger car that had been traveling directly behind the Waymo AV began to maneuver around the Waymo AV to the left. As the passenger car was passing the Waymo AV, the passenger in the Waymo AV proceeded to open the rear left door of the Waymo AV, and the right side mirror of the passenger car made contact with the open rear left side door of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. The passengers in the Waymo AV were not belted at the time of the collision, as they were preparing to exit the vehicle. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11960WaymoSource file ↗Minor injury2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-11861Passenger Car · struck on the rear right · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Minor W/ Hospitalization
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 18
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Cloudy
- Investigating Agency
- San Francisco Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 1:27 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] in the rightmost lane when a passenger car traveling directly behind the Waymo AV approached the Waymo AV from behind, and the front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. The two passengers in the Waymo AV alleged minor injuries and were transported to a hospital by an ambulance. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because individuals involved were transported from the scene to a hospital for medical treatment and a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11861WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoTempe30270-11886Passenger Car · struck on the rear right · making left turn
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Left Turn
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 2
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Left Turn
- CP Contact Area
- Front
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Intersection
- Weather
- Cloudy
- Investigating Agency
- Arizona Department of Public Safety
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 4:57 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at the on-ramp entrance to State Route [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing east on [XXX] in the designated left turn lane for a red light at the intersection with the on-ramp entrance to State Route [XXX], in autonomous mode and with its left turn signal activated. After the light turned green and westbound traffic cleared, the Waymo AV proceeded to make an unprotected left turn onto the on-ramp entrance to State Route [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was completing the left turn and was exiting the intersection, it began slowing and a passenger car traveling directly behind the Waymo AV approached the Waymo AV from behind, and the front left of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. The test driver of the Waymo AV transitioned to manual mode immediately after the passenger car made contact with the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present in the driver's seating position. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11886WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-11995Pickup Truck · struck on the front · making right turn
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Right Turn
- SV Contact Area
- Front
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 4
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Right Turn
- CP Contact Area
- Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Intersection
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 10:26 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing south on [XXX] for a red light at the intersection with [XXX] with its right turn signal activated. After the light turned green, the Waymo AV remained stopped, yielding to pedestrians crossing [XXX] in the marked crosswalk. A pickup truck that was stopped directly behind the stationary Waymo AV maneuvered left over a row of pylons marking the designated transit-only lane to pass the Waymo AV. While the pickup truck began passing the Waymo AV, pedestrian traffic cleared from the crosswalk and the Waymo AV proceeded forward to initiate the right turn onto [XXX]. As the Waymo was entering the right turn, the pickup truck initiated a right turn from the designated transit-only lane onto [XXX], and the right side of the pickup truck made contact with the front left of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11995WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoTempe30270-12035struck on the bottom · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Other Fixed Object
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Bottom
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 5
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 9:00 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a speed bump on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northwestbound on [XXX] at a low rate of speed when the undercarriage of the Waymo AV made contact with a speed bump. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. A passenger in the Waymo AV was not belted at the time of the collision. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-12035WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoLos Angeles30270-11951struck on the bottom · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Other Fixed Object
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Bottom
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 9
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Parking Lot
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 5:25 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision with raised pavement in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] in the second from the right lane when it turned left into a parking lot at [XXX]. As the Waymo AV proceeded westbound into the parking lot, the Waymo AV's undercarriage made contact with the raised pavement in the parking lot. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11951WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Mateo30270-11936Passenger Car · struck on the rear right · stopped
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Intersection
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- San Mateo Sheriffs Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 10:12 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Mateo, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at the entrance and exit ramps of State Route [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northwestbound in the left lane on [XXX] when it came to a stop before entering the intersection at the entrance and exit ramps of State Route [XXX] to yield to inoperative traffic lights that were not exhibiting any signal. While the Waymo AV remained stopped, a passenger car traveling northwestbound on [XXX] in the left lane approached the Waymo AV from behind, and the front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11936WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-12018Pickup Truck · struck on the front right · stopped
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Front Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Backing
- CP Contact Area
- Rear Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 1:34 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southeastbound on [XXX] in the rightmost lane. A pickup truck that was initially traveling southeastbound on [XXX] directly in front of the Waymo AV came to a stop, and the Waymo AV came to a stop to yield to the stopped pickup truck. While the Waymo AV was stopped, the pickup truck reversed and the rear of the pickup truck made contact with the front of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-12018WaymoSource file ↗Minor injury2025-10NHTSAWaymoPhoenix30270-12012Pickup Truck · struck on the rear · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Minor W/O Hospitalization
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 1
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- Phoenix Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 6:08 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] in the rightmost lane when it slowed for a queue of traffic at the intersection with [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was slowing, a pickup truck traveling northbound on [XXX], partially in the rightmost lane and partially in the second from the right lane, approached the Waymo AV from behind and the front right of the pickup truck made contact with the rear left of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. The passenger in the Waymo AV alleged a minor injury. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-12012WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoAustin30270-11892SUV · struck on the right · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 28
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Changing Lanes
- CP Contact Area
- Front
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 2:20 PM CT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwestbound on [XXX] in the left lane. An SUV exited the parking lot at [XXX] onto the right lane of southwestbound [XXX] in front of and to the right of the Waymo AV and proceeded to cross the dashed white lane line and enter the Waymo AV's lane of travel. The Waymo AV began braking and maneuvered to the left, and the front left side of the SUV made contact with the right side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11892WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoRedwood City30270-11888struck on the bottom · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Other Fixed Object
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Bottom
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 5
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Parking Lot
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- Redwood City Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 12:07 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Redwood City, California was in a collision involving a curb and later a speed bump in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northeastbound on [XXX] in the parking lot at [XXX] when it initiated a U-turn over a curb partitioning parking stalls. While proceeding over the dividing curb, the undercarriage of the Waymo AV made contact with the curb and the left side rail trim of the Waymo AV partially detached. After the Waymo AV completed the U-turn, the Waymo AV traveled southwestbound on [XXX], turned right onto northwestbound [XXX], and parked for a passenger pick-up. After remaining stopped for approximately five minutes, the passenger pick-up was cancelled and the Waymo AV traveled northwestbound on [XXX] for a short distance and then proceeded over a rubber speed bump. As the Waymo AV traveled over the rubber speed bump, the partially detached left side rail trim of the Waymo AV caught on the rubber speed bump. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV and the speed bump sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11888WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoDaly City30270-12046struck on the front · making left turn
- Crash With
- Other, see Narrative
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Making Left Turn
- SV Contact Area
- Front
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 5
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Other, see Narrative
- CP Contact Area
- Unknown
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Parking Lot
- Weather
- Cloudy
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 2:56 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV') operating in Daly City, California was in a collision involving a movable traffic barrier in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing west in a parking lotat [XXX] in a queue of traffic. As traffic ahead advanced, the Waymo AV proceeded to make a left turn to travel southbound within the parking lot and the front left side of the Waymo AV made contact with the movable traffic barrier that was blocking off a section of the parking lot. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-12046WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoPhoenix30270-11836Heavy Truck · struck on the front left · passing
- Crash With
- Heavy Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Passing
- SV Contact Area
- Front Left
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 1
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Parked
- CP Contact Area
- Rear
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 4:14 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a heavy truck with a flatbed trailer on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound on [XXX] behind a heavy truck with an attached flatbed trailer when the heavy truck slowed to a stop and parked at the curb on the south side of [XXX] near a stop sign at the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV slowed to a stop to yield to the parked heavy truck, which was partially in the Waymo AV's lane of travel. The Waymo AV proceeded to maneuver around the left side of the heavy truck and the front right side of the Waymo AV made contact with the rear left side of the flatbed of the heavy truck. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11836WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoPhoenix30270-11930Pickup Truck · struck on the rear right · stopped
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 5:12 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing west in the third to the right lane on [XXX] in a queue of traffic for a red light at the intersection with [XXX]. While the Waymo AV remained stopped, a pickup truck traveling westbound on [XXX] approached the Waymo AV from behind and the front of the pickup truck made contact with the rear of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11930WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-11855First Responder Vehicle · struck on the rear · stopped
- Crash With
- First Responder Vehicle
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 2:55 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an ambulance on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] with vehicles parked on both sides when it maneuvered towards a driveway opening and came to a stop to yield to an ambulance, which did not have lights or sirens activated, traveling southbound on [XXX]. As the ambulance passed the stationary Waymo AV, the left side of the ambulance made contact with the rear left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11855WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAZooxSan Francisco30610-13122Passenger Car · struck on the front right · stopped
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Front Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Backing
- CP Contact Area
- Rear Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- None
- Make
- TOYOTA
- Model
- Highlander
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomous mode was traveling eastbound on [XXX] past [XXX] in San Francisco when it began to slow gradually for a nearly stopped passenger car (Vehicle 2) ahead in the same lane. The driver of Vehicle 2 then began reversing without using turn signals. The Zoox vehicle braked to a stop, and its operator disengaged autonomy, while vehicle 2 continued to reverse, steering left, seemingly attempting to pull into a parking spot in the curb lane adjacent to the stopped Zoox vehicle. During this maneuver, the right rear corner of Vehicle 2 swiped the left front corner of the Zoox vehicle. The Zoox vehicle sustained no damage, while Vehicle 2 incurred minor damage. No injuries were reported, and law enforcement was not notified.
cause not established30610-13122ZooxSource file ↗Minor injury2025-10NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-11868SUV · struck on the front left · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Minor W/O Hospitalization
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Front Left
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 9
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Parked
- CP Contact Area
- Rear
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Cloudy
- Investigating Agency
- San Francisco Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 3:14 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode when it approached a portion of the roadway with vehicles parked at the curb on the north side. A van that was traveling eastbound on [XXX] began crossing into the path of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV began slowing and maneuvering to the right as the van approached, and the test driver transitioned the Waymo AV to manual mode. The test driver then maneuvered the Waymo AV further to the right, and the front right side of the Waymo AV made contact with the rear left side of an SUV parked at the curb on the north side of [XXX]. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. The driver of the Waymo AV alleged a minor injury. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11868WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-10NHTSAWaymoTempe30270-11887SUV · struck on the rear · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 7
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- CP Contact Area
- Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- Tempe Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On October [XXX], 2025 at 11:57 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing east in the fourth to the right lane on [XXX] in a queue of traffic for a red light at the intersection with [XXX]. An SUV was stopped facing east in the adjacent designated left turn lane to the left of the Waymo AV. As the light turned green and the Waymo AV began to proceed forward, a passenger in the SUV opened the front right side door, and the open front right side door of the SUV made contact with the rear left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11887WaymoSource file ↗Not graded by the source2025-09-30FDA MAUDEGlobus MedicalExcelsiusGPS3004142400-2025-00249ExcelsiusGPS
ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SINGLE POSITION LATERAL USING EGPS AND AIRO. L3-S1 FIXATION WITH L3-4 L4-5 LATERAL FUSION. THERE WERE HIGH SKIVE WARNINGS ON R L4 SCREW INSERTION. THE SCREW PLACED SLIGHTLY SUPERIOR AND LATERAL TO PLAN. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO PLACE SCREW MULTIPLE TIMES AND EACH ATTEMPT GAVE HIGH SKIVE WARNINGS DESPITE HS DRILL AND SIDE CUTTING DRILL FOLLOWING TRAJECTORY. IT WAS NOT TAPPED. THERE WERE NO SURVEILLANCE WARNINGS. IT WAS THEIR FIRST CASE WITH EGPS 6.1 SOFTWARE USING RELINE SCREWS. THE R L5 SCREW HAD SIMILAR ISSUE AND WAS FINALLY PLACED OVER K-WIRE. (AWL - K-WIRE - NON-NAVIGATED DRIVER) ON AIRO SCAN REVIEW THE R L4 SCREW WAS PLACED SLIGHTLY SUPERIOR AND LATERAL TO PLAN. SCREW WAS REMOVED AND NOT REPLACED. THE PATIENT SHOWED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM MISPLACED SCREW.
cause not established3004142400-2025-00249Globus MedicalExcelsiusGPSRead the record ↗Not graded by the source2025-09-24FDA MAUDEGlobus MedicalExcelsiusGPS3004142400-2025-00240ExcelsiusGPS
ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DR. (B)(6) USED THE EXCELSIUS ROBOT (INTRA-OP WORKFLOW) FOR A T11-L1 POSTERIOR LATERAL FUSION. IT IS TO BE NOTED HE ONLY PLACED PEDICLE SCREWS AT T11AND L1 SKIPPING T12 DUE TO A TUMOR SURROUNDING THE T12 VERTEBRAL BODY. DR. (B)(6) DECIDED TO PERFORM HIS DECOMPRESSION THROUGH A POSTERIOR MIDLINE INCISION PRIOR TO PLACING PEDICLE SCREWS BECAUSE HE WANTED TO KNOW HOW FAR THE TUMOR HAD SPREAD. DR. (B)(6) WANTED TO USE THE DRB AND SURVEILLANCE MARKER AND PLACED THEM IN THE PSIS AFTER DECOMPRESSION. AFTER SCREWS WERE PLACED AND ANOTHER CT SCAN WAS PERFORMED VIA E3D THE PEDICLE SCREWS ON THE PATIENT'S RIGHT SIDE WERE MEDIAL OF THE PLANNED TRAJECTORY. LEFT PEDICLE SCREWS WERE IN THE PROPER TRAJECTORY. SURVEILLANCE SHOWED THAT THE DRB HAD NOT MOVED DURING THE CASE. DR. HAMILTON REMOVED THE RIGHT SCREWS AND IMPLANTED THEM FREEHAND. HE ADVISED HE DID NOT SEE ANY DURAL LEAKS AND LATER TOLD US THE PATIENT WAS DOING WELL.
cause not established3004142400-2025-00240Globus MedicalExcelsiusGPSRead the record ↗Not graded by the source2025-09-23FDA MAUDEGlobus MedicalExcelsiusGPS3004142400-2025-00244ExcelsiusGPS
ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE REGISTRATION PROCESS, HD INTRAOPERATIVE 3D SPIN WAS USED FOR REGISTRATION. AFTER THE SPIN WAS COMPLETED, AN XRAY GENERATOR FAILURE POP UP WAS OBSERVED. THE SCAN ACQUIRED WAS UNUSABLE, WHITED OUT AND GRAINY. THE SURGEON ABANDONED E3D AND ROBOT FOR THE DURATION OF THE CASE. ADDITIONALLY, AUTO REGISTRATION FAILED AND SCAN DID NOT PUSH OVER TO ROBOT AUTOMATICALLY.
cause not established3004142400-2025-00244Globus MedicalExcelsiusGPSRead the record ↗Not graded by the source2025-09-22FDA MAUDEGlobus MedicalExcelsiusGPS3004142400-2025-00229ExcelsiusGPS
ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CANNULA WAS INSERTED INTO THE CENTER TRAJECTORY, MER TESTING WAS PERFORMED. THE CANNULA WAS THEN MOVED TO THE MEDIAL TRAJECTORY. HOWEVER, RESULTS WERE NOT AS DESIRED AND THE TARGET WAS MOVED 3MM MEDIAL FROM THE ORIGINAL CENTER TRAJECTORY. THE LEAD WAS PLACED. DURING TESTING, IT WAS DECIDED TO MOVE THE CANNULA/LEAD TO THE POSTERIOR TRAJECTORY. AT THIS POINT, THE PATIENT APPEARED TO HAVE A STROKE AND THE PATIENT WAS CLOSED AND TAKEN TO THE ER. FOLLOW UP WITH THE SURGEON REVEALED THAT THERE WERE TWO BLEEDS UNILATERALLY ON THE RIGHT AT THE INTERNAL CAPSULE. THE SURGEON STATED THAT EVERY TRACK PLACED IS A 1% RISK OF THIS OCCURRING (4 TOTAL TRACKS ON RIGHT SIDE). THE LAST INFORMATION RECEIVED WAS THAT THEY WERE WAKING THE PATIENT UP, BUT IT IS UNKNOWN IF ANY DEFICITS ARE TEMPORARY AT THIS TIME.
cause not established3004142400-2025-00229Globus MedicalExcelsiusGPSRead the record ↗No injury reported2025-09-20Press recordsUnitree Robotics
This vulnerability affects multiple Unitree robot models including Go2, G1, H1 and B2 series robots up to the latest firmware from today [20. September 2025].
cause not establishedUnitree RoboticsRead the record ↗Not graded by the source2025-09-18FDA MAUDEGlobus MedicalExcelsiusGPS3004142400-2025-00233ExcelsiusGPS
ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT SCREWS USING THE EXCELSIUS GPS SYSTEM WERE MISPLACED AND REVISED INTRA-OPERATIVELY.
cause not established3004142400-2025-00233Globus MedicalExcelsiusGPSRead the record ↗Not graded by the source2025-09-16FDA MAUDEGlobus MedicalExcelsiusGPS3004142400-2025-00235ExcelsiusGPS
ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT SCREWS USING THE EXCELSIUS GPS SYSTEM WERE MISPLACED AND REVISED INTRA-OPERATIVELY.
cause not established3004142400-2025-00235Globus MedicalExcelsiusGPSRead the record ↗Not graded by the source2025-09-12FDA MAUDEDePuy SynthesVELYS™ Robotic-Assisted Solution1818910-2025-20272VELYS
VELYS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: POPLITEAL ARTERIA INJURY WHILE USING VELYS DURING A KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. THE SURGEON EXPLAINED THAT THEY DID NOT USE RETRACTORS AS USUAL FOR A RECUT AND FACED A POPLITEAL ARTERIA INJURY. THEY MADE A SUTURE DIRECTLY ON THE ARTERIA TO STOP THE BLEEDING AND THE PATIENT HAD NO MAJOR HEMORAGIA, AND NO OTHER VASCULAR SURGERY NEEDED. ARTHERIOGRAPHY WAS DONE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A FIFTEEN MINUTE DELAY. PATIENT RECEIVED SURVEILLANCE IN THE ICU FOR A NIGHT AND A PLATELET-INHIBITING AGENT.
cause not established1818910-2025-20272DePuy SynthesVELYS™ Robotic-Assisted SolutionRead the record ↗Property damage only2025-09NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-11839Passenger Car · struck on the rear right · stopped
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Intersection
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 5:41 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing north on [XXX] for a stop sign at the intersection at [XXX]. While the Waymo AV remained stopped to yield to pedestrians crossing the street, a passenger car with hazard lights activated approached the Waymo AV from behind and the front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11839WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-09NHTSAWaymoCulver City30270-11608Pickup Truck · struck on the right · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 2
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Parked
- CP Contact Area
- Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- Culver City Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 1:57 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Culver City, California was in a collision involving a flatbed pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked at the curb facing west on [XXX] and a flatbed pickup truck was parked in front of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV proceeded to maneuver forward and to the left to exit its parking spot, and the front right side of the Waymo AV made contact with the left rear side of the flatbed of the truck. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11608WaymoSource file ↗Minor injury2025-09NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-11689struck on the bottom · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Other Fixed Object
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Minor W/O Hospitalization
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Bottom
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 11
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Parking Lot
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- ZEEKR
- Model
- RT
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 4:32 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California made contact with the pavement at the parking lot entrance of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was in autonomous mode traveling eastbound on [XXX] when it began to turn left into a parking lot at [XXX]. As the Waymo AV proceeded northbound into the entrance of the parking lot, the Waymo AV's undercarriage made contact with the pavement at the entrance of the parking lot. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The test driver of the Waymo AV alleged minor injuries. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11689WaymoSource file ↗Minor injury2025-09NHTSAWaymoAtlanta30270-11794Pickup Truck · struck on the left · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Minor W/ Hospitalization
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Left
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 19
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Intersection
- Weather
- Clear
- Investigating Agency
- Atlanta Police Department
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 2:44 AM ET a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Atlanta, Georgia was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the second to the left lane. As the Waymo proceeded through a green light at the intersection with [XXX], a passenger car that was traveling westbound in the rightmost lane on [XXX] proceeded through the intersection at [XXX] against a red light without stopping. The front of the passenger car made contact with the left side of a pickup truck that was traveling southbound in the leftmost lane on [XXX]. The right side of the pickup truck then made contact with the left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV, the passenger car, and the pickup truck sustained damage. The passenger in the Waymo AV alleged minor injuries and was transported to a hospital in an ambulance. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because an individual involved was transported from the scene to a hospital for medical treatment, vehicles involved were towed away, and airbags were deployed. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11794WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-09NHTSAWaymoPhoenix30270-11715Heavy Truck · struck on the front right · stopped
- Crash With
- Heavy Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Front Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Backing
- CP Contact Area
- Rear Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Parking Lot
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 11:08 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a heavy truck in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound through a parking lot at [XXX] when it made a left turn and slowed to a stop to yield to a heavy truck blocking the roadway. Another Waymo AV was attempting to maneuver around the stopped heavy truck and came to a stop to its left. While the other Waymo AV remained stopped, the heavy truck reversed and the rear of the heavy truck made contact with the front of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11715WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-09NHTSAWaymoAustin30270-11692Passenger Car · struck on the front right · backing
- Crash With
- Passenger Car
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Backing
- SV Contact Area
- Front Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 3
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Backing
- CP Contact Area
- Rear Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 6:11 PM CT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southeastbound in the leftmost lane on [XXX] when it slowed to a stop to yield to an SUV that was initially traveling in the leftmost lane but had stopped in-lane. The passenger car reversed, and then the Waymo AV reversed to yield to the passenger car. The passenger car continued to reverse and the rear of the passenger car made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11692WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-09NHTSAWaymoLos Angeles30270-11753SUV · struck on the rear · stopped
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 12:16 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] when it slowed to a stop and parked in-lane for a passenger drop-off with hazard lights activated. While the Waymo AV was stopped, an SUV that was traveling northbound on [XXX] directly behind the Waymo AV proceeded to pass the Waymo AV on the left. While the SUV was maneuvering around the stationary Waymo AV, a passenger in the Waymo AV opened the rear left door and the open rear left door made contact with the right side of the SUV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. A passenger in the Waymo AV was not belted at the time of the collision, likely as they were preparing to exit the Waymo AV. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11753WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-09NHTSAWaymoAustin30270-11850SUV · struck on the rear right · proceeding straight
- Crash With
- SUV
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- SV Contact Area
- Rear Right
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 1
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Right
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Intersection
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 8:40 AM CT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound in the left lane on [XXX] when it came to a stop at a red light at the intersection at [XXX]. As the traffic light turned green and traffic ahead advanced, the Waymo AV initially proceeded forward and then began to slow before entering the intersection, after detecting a siren from an emergency vehicle. As the Waymo AV was slowing, an SUV approached the Waymo AV from behind and the front of the SUV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11850WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-09NHTSAWaymoAustin30270-11759Pickup Truck · struck on the front · changing lanes
- Crash With
- Pickup Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Changing Lanes
- SV Contact Area
- Front
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 1
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Proceeding Straight
- CP Contact Area
- Front Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Street
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 4:41 PM CT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at the curb facing south on [XXX] when it proceeded to maneuver from its parking spot into the roadway. The Waymo AV then began to change lanes into the designated left turn lane in front of a pickup truck that was stopped in the designated left turn lane on [XXX] for a queue of traffic ahead. As the Waymo AV entered the designated left turn lane, the pickup truck proceeded forward and the front right side of the pickup truck made contact with the front left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11759WaymoSource file ↗Property damage only2025-09NHTSAWaymoSan Francisco30270-11618Heavy Truck · struck on the rear · stopped
- Crash With
- Heavy Truck
- Highest Injury Severity Alleged
- Property Damage. No Injured Reported
- SV Pre-Crash Movement
- Stopped
- SV Contact Area
- Rear
- SV Precrash Speed (MPH)
- 0
- CP Pre-Crash Movement
- Crossing into Opposing Lane
- CP Contact Area
- Left
- Within ODD?
- Yes
- Automation System Engaged?
- ADS
- Roadway Type
- Intersection
- Weather
- Clear
- Make
- JAGUAR
- Model
- I-PACE
SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.
On September [XXX], 2025 at 2:52 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] when it came to a stop for a red light at the intersection with [XXX]. A heavy truck and trailer traveling eastbound on [XXX] initiated a right turn onto southbound [XXX]. As the heavy truck was completing the turn and passing the stationary Waymo AV, the left side of the heavy truck's cab made contact with the rear left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
cause not established30270-11618WaymoSource file ↗