Side-by-side comparison of ACR (Hyundai Motor Group) and cocobo (SECOM) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price

Availability Status

Payload Capacity

Reach

Max Speed

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | South Korea | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $40,250 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 50 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 5,565 mm | 978 mm |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1.3 m/s | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | ACR | cocobo |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $40,250 | No price |
| Payback period | 9.7 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $209,750 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +521% | — |
cocobo has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
ACR is made by Hyundai Motor Group, based in KR. cocobo is made by SECOM.
ACR launched in 2025. cocobo launched in 2022.
ACR grades AA on the Robo Index. cocobo grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Security on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The security-robot vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The security-robot vendor RFP: questions and red flags
10 min readSecurity & Surveillance Robots
A 90-day playbook to deploy a security robot
8 min readSecurity & Surveillance Robots
Security robot platform decision framework
7 min readSecurity & Surveillance Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
ACR vs cocobo compares two robots in the security category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.