ACR vs HUNTER 2.0
Side-by-side comparison of ACR (Hyundai Motor Group) and HUNTER 2.0 (Agilex) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ACRSouth Korea
- HUNTER 2.0China
Year First Available
- ACR2025
- HUNTER 2.0—
Verified Deployments
- ACR0 Deployments
- HUNTER 2.00 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- ACR$40,250 USD
- HUNTER 2.0$7,800 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- ACR—
- HUNTER 2.04 hrs
Availability Status
- ACRACTIVE
- HUNTER 2.0ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- ACR50 kg
- HUNTER 2.0150 kg
Reach
- ACR5,565 mm
- HUNTER 2.0—
Max Speed
- ACR1.3 m/s
- HUNTER 2.01.5 m/s
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | South Korea | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $40,250 USD | $7,800 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 50 kg | 150 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 5,565 mm | — |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1.3 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | ACR | HUNTER 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $40,250 | $7,800 |
| Payback period | 9.7 mo | 1.9 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $209,750 | $242,200 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +521% | +3105% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes ACR and HUNTER 2.0?
ACR is made by Hyundai Motor Group, based in KR. HUNTER 2.0 is made by Agilex, based in CN.
How do ACR and HUNTER 2.0 compare on the Robo Index?
ACR grades AA on the Robo Index. HUNTER 2.0 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are ACR and HUNTER 2.0 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Security on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between ACR and HUNTER 2.0?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The security-robot vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The security-robot vendor RFP: questions and red flags
10 min readSecurity & Surveillance Robots
A 90-day playbook to deploy a security robot
8 min readSecurity & Surveillance Robots
Security robot platform decision framework
7 min readSecurity & Surveillance Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
ACR vs HUNTER 2.0 compares two robots in the security category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.