A2-W vs TM Xplore I
Side-by-side comparison of A2-W (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and TM Xplore I (Techman Robot Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- A2-WChina
- TM Xplore ITaiwan
Year First Available
- A2-W2023
- TM Xplore I2025
Verified Deployments
- A2-W0 Deployments
- TM Xplore I0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- A2-W$145,000 USD
- TM Xplore I$25,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- A2-W2 hrs
- TM Xplore I2 hrs
Availability Status
- A2-WACTIVE
- TM Xplore IACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- A2-W69 kg
- TM Xplore I33.3 kg
Height
- A2-W163 mm
- TM Xplore I1600 mm
Mobility Type
- A2-Wwheeled
- TM Xplore Iwheeled
Humanoid Subtype
- A2-Wwheeled humanoid
- TM Xplore Iwheeled humanoid
Walking Speed
- A2-W1.9 m/s
- TM Xplore I0.8 m/s
Stair Climbing
- A2-Wnone
- TM Xplore I—
Terrain
- A2-Wflat_indoor
- TM Xplore Iflat indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- A2-W5 kg
- TM Xplore I20 kg
Total DOF
- A2-W22
- TM Xplore I22
Arm DOF
- A2-W7
- TM Xplore I—
Hand DOF
- A2-W17
- TM Xplore I5
Bimanual Coordination
- A2-Wcoordinated planning
- TM Xplore I—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- A2-W275 TOPS
- TM Xplore INVIDIA Jetson Orin
VLM Capable
- A2-WNo
- TM Xplore INo
Foundation Models
- A2-Wfalse
- TM Xplore I—
Imitation Learning
- A2-WNo
- TM Xplore INo
Programming
- A2-Wcode_python, visual_block
- TM Xplore IAPI/SDK for task programming and customization
Battery & Power
Runtime
- A2-W5 hrs
- TM Xplore I2 hrs
Battery Capacity
- A2-W2 kWh
- TM Xplore I—
Charging Time
- A2-W2 hrs
- TM Xplore I—
Charging Method
- A2-Wmanual swap
- TM Xplore I—
Battery Swap
- A2-WYes
- TM Xplore I—
Safety
Human Detection Method
- A2-Wmulti modal
- TM Xplore I—
Software
SDK Languages
- A2-Wcode_python, visual_block
- TM Xplore IPython
ROS Support
- A2-WNo
- TM Xplore INo
Open API
- A2-WNo
- TM Xplore IYes
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- A2-Wcommercial
- TM Xplore Iprototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- A2-W$145,000 USD
- TM Xplore I$25,000 USD
Price Tier
- A2-W80-150K
- TM Xplore I40-80K
Pricing Model
- A2-Wpurchase
- TM Xplore I—
Warranty
- A2-W2 yrs
- TM Xplore I—
Applications
- A2-Wcustomer_service, manufacturing, logistics, healthcare
- TM Xplore Iinspection, quality_control
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Taiwan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $145,000 USD | $25,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 69 kg | 33.3 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 163 mm | 1600 mm |
| Mobility Type | wheeled | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype | wheeled humanoid | wheeled humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 0.8 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 20 kg |
| Total DOF | 22 | 22 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | 5 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | coordinated planning | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 275 TOPS | NVIDIA Jetson Orin |
| VLM Capable | No | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning | No | No |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, visual_block | API/SDK for task programming and customization |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 2 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, visual_block | Python |
| ROS Support | No | No |
| Open API (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $145,000 USD | $25,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | customer_service, manufacturing, logistics, healthcare | inspection, quality_control |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | A2-W | TM Xplore I |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $145,000 | $25,000 |
| Payback period | 34.8 mo | 6.0 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $105,000 | $225,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +72% | +900% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes A2-W and TM Xplore I?
A2-W is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. TM Xplore I is made by Techman Robot Inc., based in TW.
When were A2-W and TM Xplore I launched?
A2-W launched in 2023. TM Xplore I launched in 2025.
How much does A2-W cost compared to TM Xplore I?
A2-W is listed at $145,000. TM Xplore I is listed at $25,000.
How do A2-W and TM Xplore I compare on the Robo Score?
A2-W scores 69.0 on the Robo Score. TM Xplore I scores 47.9. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between A2-W and TM Xplore I?
A2-W carries up to 15 kg. TM Xplore I carries up to 20 kg.
Are A2-W and TM Xplore I in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between A2-W and TM Xplore I?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
A2-W vs TM Xplore I compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.