Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT G2 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Armar 6 (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Price Range (USD)
Battery / Shift Runtime
Availability Status
Height
Weight
Mobility Type
Humanoid Subtype
Walking Speed
Running Capable
Stair Climbing
Terrain
Payload
Total DOF
Arm DOF
Hand DOF
Bimanual Coordination
Tool Use
Onboard Compute
Compute Platform
VLM Capable
Foundation Models
Imitation Learning
Teleoperation
Programming
Runtime
Charging Method
Battery Swap
Force-Limited Arms
Fall Recovery
Human Detection Method
Safe Speed Near Humans
SDK Languages
ROS Support
Simulation Platforms
Open API
Air-Gap Capable
IP Rating
Task Success Rate
Deployment Maturity
Price (USD)
Price Tier
Pricing Model
Production Pilots
Applications
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $87 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 4 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 175 mm | 192 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 55 kg | 150 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 3.6 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, rough_indoor | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 26 | 27 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 8 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | 4 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | Yes |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | vendor demo |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 500 TOPS | Various computers for processing tasks |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Thor T5000 | Intel Core i7-6700 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard large | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | GO-1, WorkGPT, Genie | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick, web_interface | — |
| Programming (values differ) | no_code_gui, code_python, teleoperation | ArmarX (custom software) |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 2.5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | vision human |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Genie Sim 3.0 | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | No |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | IP42 | — |
| Task Success Rate (values differ) | 99 % | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $87 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex, pilot_fee | capex |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | Automotive seatbelt lock cylinder assembly, Consumer electronics precision tasks | — |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly, inspection, hospitality, warehouse_transport | eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
Frequently asked
AGIBOT G2 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Armar 6 is made by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, based in DE.
AGIBOT G2 launched in 2025. Armar 6 launched in 2017.
AGIBOT G2 scores 30/100. Armar 6 scores 100/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AGIBOT G2 carries up to 5 kg. Armar 6 carries up to 10 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AGIBOT G2 vs Armar 6 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.