AGIBOT G2 vs MATRIX-3
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT G2 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and MATRIX-3 (Matrix Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AGIBOT G2China
- MATRIX-3China
Year First Available
- AGIBOT G22025
- MATRIX-32026
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT G20 Deployments
- MATRIX-30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AGIBOT G2Contact for quote
- MATRIX-3$85,000–$99,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AGIBOT G24 hrs
- MATRIX-35 hrs
Availability Status
- AGIBOT G2ACTIVE
- MATRIX-3ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AGIBOT G2175 mm
- MATRIX-31600 mm
Weight
- AGIBOT G255 kg
- MATRIX-3—
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT G2wheeled
- MATRIX-3bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT G2wheeled humanoid
- MATRIX-3full bipedal
Walking Speed
- AGIBOT G21.9 m/s
- MATRIX-32.1 m/s
Running Capable
- AGIBOT G2static walk
- MATRIX-3—
Stair Climbing
- AGIBOT G2none
- MATRIX-3No
Terrain
- AGIBOT G2flat_indoor, rough_indoor
- MATRIX-3unstructured environments
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AGIBOT G25 kg
- MATRIX-310 kg
Total DOF
- AGIBOT G226
- MATRIX-327
Arm DOF
- AGIBOT G27
- MATRIX-3—
Hand DOF
- AGIBOT G212
- MATRIX-327
Bimanual Coordination
- AGIBOT G2full bimanual
- MATRIX-3No
Tool Use
- AGIBOT G2production validated
- MATRIX-3—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AGIBOT G2500 TOPS
- MATRIX-3proprietary neural network architecture
Compute Platform
- AGIBOT G2NVIDIA Jetson Thor T5000
- MATRIX-3—
VLM Capable
- AGIBOT G2onboard large
- MATRIX-3No
Foundation Models
- AGIBOT G2GO-1, WorkGPT, Genie
- MATRIX-3—
Imitation Learning
- AGIBOT G2multi task
- MATRIX-3No
Teleoperation
- AGIBOT G2joystick, web_interface
- MATRIX-3—
Programming
- AGIBOT G2no_code_gui, code_python, teleoperation
- MATRIX-3natural language instructions
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AGIBOT G24 hrs
- MATRIX-35 hrs
Charging Method
- AGIBOT G2auto dock
- MATRIX-3—
Battery Swap
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- MATRIX-3No
Safety
Force-Limited Arms
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- MATRIX-3—
Fall Recovery
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- MATRIX-3—
Human Detection Method
- AGIBOT G2multi modal
- MATRIX-3—
Safe Speed Near Humans
- AGIBOT G2software_defined
- MATRIX-3—
Software
SDK Languages
- AGIBOT G2Python
- MATRIX-3natural language instructions
ROS Support
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- MATRIX-3No
Simulation Platforms
- AGIBOT G2Genie Sim 3.0
- MATRIX-3—
Open API
- AGIBOT G2open rest
- MATRIX-3No
Air-Gap Capable
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- MATRIX-3—
Reliability
Task Success Rate
- AGIBOT G299 %
- MATRIX-3—
Deployment Maturity
- AGIBOT G2production pilot
- MATRIX-3prototype
IP Rating
- AGIBOT G2IP42
- MATRIX-3—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AGIBOT G2Contact for quote
- MATRIX-3$85,000–$99,000 USD
Price Tier
- AGIBOT G2150K+
- MATRIX-380-150K
Pricing Model
- AGIBOT G2capex, pilot_fee
- MATRIX-3—
Production Pilots
- AGIBOT G2Automotive seatbelt lock cylinder assembly, Consumer electronics precision tasks
- MATRIX-3—
Applications
- AGIBOT G2assembly, inspection, hospitality, warehouse_transport
- MATRIX-3healthcare, commercial, home
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $85,000–$99,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 175 mm | 1600 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 55 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 2.1 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, rough_indoor | unstructured environments |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 26 | 27 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | 27 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | No |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 500 TOPS | proprietary neural network architecture |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Thor T5000 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard large | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | GO-1, WorkGPT, Genie | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick, web_interface | — |
| Programming (values differ) | no_code_gui, code_python, teleoperation | natural language instructions |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | natural language instructions |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Genie Sim 3.0 | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | No |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Task Success Rate (values differ) | 99 % | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP42 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $85,000–$99,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex, pilot_fee | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | Automotive seatbelt lock cylinder assembly, Consumer electronics precision tasks | — |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly, inspection, hospitality, warehouse_transport | healthcare, commercial, home |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AGIBOT G2 | MATRIX-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $92,000 |
| Payback period | — | 22.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $158,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +172% |
AGIBOT G2 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AGIBOT G2 and MATRIX-3?
AGIBOT G2 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. MATRIX-3 is made by Matrix Robotics, based in CN.
When were AGIBOT G2 and MATRIX-3 launched?
AGIBOT G2 launched in 2025. MATRIX-3 launched in 2026.
How do AGIBOT G2 and MATRIX-3 compare on the Robo Index?
AGIBOT G2 grades AA on the Robo Index. MATRIX-3 grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between AGIBOT G2 and MATRIX-3?
AGIBOT G2 carries up to 5 kg. MATRIX-3 carries up to 10 kg.
Are AGIBOT G2 and MATRIX-3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AGIBOT G2 and MATRIX-3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AGIBOT G2 vs MATRIX-3 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.