Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT X1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Atlas HD (Boston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Weight

Height

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Running Capable

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Payload (Peak)

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Arm Reach

Grip Strength

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

Foundation Models

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Charging Time

Charging Method

Battery Swap

Fall Recovery

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Simulation Platforms

Open API

Deployment Maturity

IP Rating

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Warranty

Production Pilots

Applications

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 USD | $150,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 33.8 kg | 90 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 190 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | — |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | production ready |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 50 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 50 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 56 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 230 cm |
| Grip Strength (values differ) | 30 N | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Xyber-Edge cerebellum controller, Xyber-DCU domain controller | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson or x86 PC | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | Google DeepMind |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | AI and machine learning tools |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 0.1 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | AI and machine learning tools |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Isaac Gym, MuJoCo | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | production pilot |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 USD | $150,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | Hyundai RMAC, Google DeepMind |
| Applications (values differ) | healthcare_assistance, education, service_industry | warehouse_transport, assembly, inspection |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time
Frequently asked
AGIBOT X1 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Atlas HD is made by Boston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary), based in US.
AGIBOT X1 launched in 2025. Atlas HD launched in 2016.
AGIBOT X1 is listed at $30,000. Atlas HD is listed at $150,000.
AGIBOT X1 grades A on the Robo Index. Atlas HD grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AGIBOT X1 carries up to 15 kg. Atlas HD carries up to 50 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AGIBOT X1 vs Atlas HD compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.