Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT X1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Olivia (A*STAR Social Robotics Lab) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Price Range (USD)
Battery / Shift Runtime
Availability Status
Height
Weight
Mobility Type
Humanoid Subtype
Walking Speed
Running Capable
Stair Climbing
Terrain
Payload
Total DOF
Arm DOF
Hand DOF
Grip Strength
Bimanual Coordination
Tool Use
Onboard Compute
Compute Platform
VLM Capable
Imitation Learning
Teleoperation
Programming
Runtime
Charging Time
Charging Method
Battery Swap
Force-Limited Arms
Fall Recovery
Human Detection Method
Safe Speed Near Humans
SDK Languages
ROS Support
Simulation Platforms
Open API
Deployment Maturity
Price (USD)
Price Tier
Pricing Model
Warranty
Applications
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Singapore |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 USD | $198 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 16 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 160 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 33.8 kg | 152 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 0.5 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | static walk |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 132 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 24 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 6 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | 6 |
| Grip Strength (values differ) | 30 N | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | independent |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | none |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Xyber-Edge cerebellum controller, Xyber-DCU domain controller | Intel Core i7 |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson or x86 PC | Intel Core i7 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | none |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | single task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | proprietary_app, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 16 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 4.5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | auto dock |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | none |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | none |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | Java, Kotlin |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | none |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Isaac Gym, MuJoCo | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | closed |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | prototype | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 USD | $198 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | capex |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | healthcare_assistance, education, service_industry | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Manipulation Repeatability, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
AGIBOT X1 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Olivia is made by A*STAR Social Robotics Lab, based in SG.
AGIBOT X1 launched in 2025. Olivia launched in 2009.
AGIBOT X1 is listed at $30,000. Olivia is listed at $198.
AGIBOT X1 grades A on the Robo Index. Olivia grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AGIBOT X1 carries up to 15 kg. Olivia carries up to 132 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AGIBOT X1 vs Olivia compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.