AGIBOT X1 vs Tien Kung
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT X1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Tien Kung (X-Humanoid) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 AGIBOT X1humanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.43.9Trust Score |  Tien KunghumanoidX-Humanoid43.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available | 2025 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $41,200 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 3.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 1700 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 33.8 kg | 73 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 3.3 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 6 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 20 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | 6 |
| Grip Strength (values differ) | 30 N | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Xyber-Edge cerebellum controller, Xyber-DCU domain controller | Nvidia Jetson Orin |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson or x86 PC | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | voice, app control |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 3.5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | voice, app control |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | Yes |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Isaac Gym, MuJoCo | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $41,200 |
| Price Tier | 40-80K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | healthcare_assistance, education, service_industry | research, hazardous_env, industrial automation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT X1 vs Tien Kung compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.