Side-by-side comparison of AgiBot X2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and BINA48 (Hanson Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Payload (Peak)


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Arm Reach


Bimanual Coordination


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Charging Time


Charging Method


Battery Swap


Human Detection Method


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Open API


IP Rating


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Delivery Lead Time


Warranty


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Hong Kong |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2010 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $54,274–$54,754 USD | $100,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 131 mm | 165 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 39 kg | 75 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2 m/s | 1.2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Stair Climbing | No | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1 kg | 20 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 31 | 32 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 55.8 cm | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 157 TOPS | NVIDIA Xavier AGX |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | RK3588 and Orin NX | — |
| VLM Capable | No | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning | No | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, proprietary_app | proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 0.5 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | proprietary_app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | Yes |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $54,274–$54,754 USD | $100,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | 2 mo | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | research, hospitality, education | research, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
AgiBot X2 Ultra is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. BINA48 is made by Hanson Robotics, based in HK.
AgiBot X2 Ultra scores 65/100. BINA48 scores 99/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AgiBot X2 Ultra carries up to 3 kg. BINA48 carries up to 20 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AgiBot X2 Ultra vs BINA48 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.