Side-by-side comparison of AgiBot X2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and P1 Biped (Shenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Payload (Peak)


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Arm Reach


Bimanual Coordination


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Charging Time


Charging Method


Battery Swap


Human Detection Method


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Simulation Platforms


Open API


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Delivery Lead Time


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $54,274–$54,754 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 131 mm | 78 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 39 kg | 20 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2 m/s | 0.5 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1 kg | 15 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 31 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 55.8 cm | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 157 TOPS | 11th Gen i7/16GB/512GB Wi-Fi6 |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | RK3588 and Orin NX | Intel Core embedded computer |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, proprietary_app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 0.5 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | manual swap |
| Battery Swap | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | Gazebo, MuJoCo, Isaac Gym |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $54,274–$54,754 USD | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | 2 mo | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research, hospitality, education | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
AgiBot X2 Ultra is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. P1 Biped is made by Shenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
AgiBot X2 Ultra scores 66/100. P1 Biped scores 66/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AgiBot X2 Ultra carries up to 3 kg. P1 Biped carries up to 15 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AgiBot X2 Ultra vs P1 Biped compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.