Side-by-side comparison of Armar 6 (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) and TRON 1 (Shenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Height

Weight

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Running Capable

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Payload (Peak)

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Bimanual Coordination

Tool Use

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

VLM Capable

Foundation Models

Imitation Learning

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Battery Capacity

Charging Time

Charging Method

Battery Swap

Human Detection Method

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Simulation Platforms

Open API

Deployment Maturity

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Developer Unit Price

Delivery Lead Time

Warranty

Applications

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2017 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $87 USD | $15,000–$25,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 192 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 150 kg | 20 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | hybrid |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | research platform |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.6 m/s | 1 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | 0 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 15 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 27 | 19 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 8 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | 0 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Tool Use (values differ) | vendor demo | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Various computers for processing tasks | 12th Gen Intel i3/16G/512G |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Intel Core i7-6700 | 12th Gen i3 |
| VLM Capable | No | No |
| Foundation Models | false | false |
| Imitation Learning | No | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | ArmarX (custom software) | SDK |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.2 kWh |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 1.5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | tethered |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | Python, C++ |
| ROS Support (values differ) | No | ros2 community |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Isaac, Mujoco, Gazebo |
| Open API (values differ) | No | open rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | prototype | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $87 USD | $15,000–$25,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $15,000 |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 1 mo |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
Armar 6 is made by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, based in DE. TRON 1 is made by Shenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
Armar 6 launched in 2017. TRON 1 launched in 2024.
Armar 6 scores 100/100. TRON 1 scores 81/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Armar 6 carries up to 10 kg. TRON 1 carries up to 10 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Armar 6 vs TRON 1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.