AUBO-i20 vs Rizon 10
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i20 (AUBO Robotics) and Rizon 10 (Flexiv Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-i20China

- Rizon 10China

Year First Available
- AUBO-i202015

- Rizon 102016

Verified Deployments
- AUBO-i200 Deployments

- Rizon 100 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AUBO-i20Contact for quote

- Rizon 10$65,000 USD

Availability Status
- AUBO-i20ACTIVE

- Rizon 10ACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- AUBO-i2063.7 kg

- Rizon 1033 kg

Max TCP Speed
- AUBO-i202.6 m/s

- Rizon 10—

Payload
- AUBO-i2020 kg

- Rizon 1010 kg

Reach
- AUBO-i201,650 mm

- Rizon 101,015 mm

Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-i206

- Rizon 107

Repeatability
- AUBO-i20±0.1 mm

- Rizon 10±0.1 mm

Mounting Options
- AUBO-i20Any

- Rizon 10—

IP Rating
- AUBO-i20IP54

- Rizon 10IP65

Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-i20CE

- Rizon 10CE, ISO/TS 15066

Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-i20software only

- Rizon 10Yes

Duty Cycle
- AUBO-i2024 7 continuous

- Rizon 10—

Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- AUBO-i20Yes

- Rizon 10—

Offline Programming
- AUBO-i20Yes

- Rizon 10—

Programming Interface
- AUBO-i20proprietary_app

- Rizon 10drag_and_drop, code_python

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-i20iso 9283 compatible

- Rizon 10—

Wrist Power Supply
- AUBO-i2024V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V

- Rizon 10—

Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- AUBO-i20Python, C++

- Rizon 10—

ROS Compatible
- AUBO-i20Yes

- Rizon 10—

Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-i20Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional)

- Rizon 10—

Digital Twin Support
- AUBO-i20Yes

- Rizon 10—

Commercial
Price (USD)
- AUBO-i20Contact for quote

- Rizon 10$65,000 USD

Warranty
- AUBO-i203 yrs

- Rizon 10—

![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $65,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 63.7 kg | 33 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 2.6 m/s | — |
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 10 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,650 mm | 1,015 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 7 |
| Repeatability | ±0.1 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | Any | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | IP65 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | software only | Yes |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 24 7 continuous | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | drag_and_drop, code_python |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | iso 9283 compatible | — |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 24V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | — |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional) | — |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $65,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUBO-i20 | Rizon 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $65,000 |
| Payback period | — | 15.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $185,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +285% |
AUBO-i20 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-i20 and Rizon 10?
AUBO-i20 is made by AUBO Robotics, based in CN. Rizon 10 is made by Flexiv Ltd., based in CN.
When were AUBO-i20 and Rizon 10 launched?
AUBO-i20 launched in 2015. Rizon 10 launched in 2016.
How do AUBO-i20 and Rizon 10 compare on the Robo Index?
AUBO-i20 grades AA on the Robo Index. Rizon 10 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of AUBO-i20 compare to Rizon 10?
AUBO-i20 has a reach of 1650 mm. Rizon 10 has a reach of 1015 mm.
Are AUBO-i20 and Rizon 10 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-i20 and Rizon 10?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUBO-i20 vs Rizon 10 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.