AUBO-i20 vs Rizon 4
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i20 (AUBO Robotics) and Rizon 4 (Flexiv Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-i20China
- Rizon 4China
Year First Available
- AUBO-i202015
- Rizon 42016
Verified Deployments
- AUBO-i200 Deployments
- Rizon 40 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AUBO-i20Contact for quote
- Rizon 4$35,000–$65,000 USD
Availability Status
- AUBO-i20ACTIVE
- Rizon 4ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Repeatability
- AUBO-i20±0.1 mm
- Rizon 4±0.05 mm
IP Rating
- AUBO-i20IP54
- Rizon 4IP65
Reach
- AUBO-i201,650 mm
- Rizon 4919 mm
Payload
- AUBO-i2020 kg
- Rizon 44 kg
Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-i206
- Rizon 47
Max TCP Speed
- AUBO-i202.6 m/s
- Rizon 4—
Robot Weight
- AUBO-i2063.7 kg
- Rizon 420 kg
Mounting Options
- AUBO-i20Any
- Rizon 4floor, ceiling, wall, inverted
Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-i20CE
- Rizon 4ISO 13849 PL=d, ISO 10218
Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-i20software only
- Rizon 4integrated wrist ft
Duty Cycle
- AUBO-i2024 7 continuous
- Rizon 4—
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- AUBO-i20Yes
- Rizon 4Yes
Offline Programming
- AUBO-i20Yes
- Rizon 4No
Programming Interface
- AUBO-i20proprietary_app
- Rizon 4Flexiv Elements, Robot Development Kit (RDK)
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-i20iso 9283 compatible
- Rizon 4—
Wrist Power Supply
- AUBO-i2024V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V
- Rizon 4—
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- AUBO-i20Python, C++
- Rizon 4—
ROS Compatible
- AUBO-i20Yes
- Rizon 4—
Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-i20Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional)
- Rizon 4—
Digital Twin Support
- AUBO-i20Yes
- Rizon 4—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AUBO-i20Contact for quote
- Rizon 4$35,000–$65,000 USD
Warranty
- AUBO-i203 yrs
- Rizon 4—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $35,000–$65,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | IP65 |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | 1,650 mm | 919 mm |
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 4 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 7 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 2.6 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 63.7 kg | 20 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | Any | floor, ceiling, wall, inverted |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | ISO 13849 PL=d, ISO 10218 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | software only | integrated wrist ft |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 24 7 continuous | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | Flexiv Elements, Robot Development Kit (RDK) |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | iso 9283 compatible | — |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 24V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | — |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional) | — |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $35,000–$65,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUBO-i20 | Rizon 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $50,000 |
| Payback period | — | 12.0 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $200,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +400% |
AUBO-i20 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-i20 and Rizon 4?
AUBO-i20 is made by AUBO Robotics, based in CN. Rizon 4 is made by Flexiv Ltd., based in CN.
When were AUBO-i20 and Rizon 4 launched?
AUBO-i20 launched in 2015. Rizon 4 launched in 2016.
How do AUBO-i20 and Rizon 4 compare on the Robo Index?
AUBO-i20 grades AA on the Robo Index. Rizon 4 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of AUBO-i20 compare to Rizon 4?
AUBO-i20 has a reach of 1650 mm. Rizon 4 has a reach of 919 mm.
Are AUBO-i20 and Rizon 4 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-i20 and Rizon 4?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUBO-i20 vs Rizon 4 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.