AUBO-i20 vs MOTOMAN HC30PL
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i20 (AUBO Robotics) and MOTOMAN HC30PL (Motoman) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-i20China

- MOTOMAN HC30PLJapan

Year First Available
- AUBO-i202015

- MOTOMAN HC30PL2019

Verified Deployments
- AUBO-i200 Deployments

- MOTOMAN HC30PL0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AUBO-i20Contact for quote

- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD

Availability Status
- AUBO-i20ACTIVE

- MOTOMAN HC30PLACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Reach
- AUBO-i201,650 mm

- MOTOMAN HC30PL1,300 mm

Repeatability
- AUBO-i20±0.1 mm

- MOTOMAN HC30PL±0.03 mm

Payload
- AUBO-i2020 kg

- MOTOMAN HC30PL5 kg

IP Rating
- AUBO-i20IP54

- MOTOMAN HC30PLIP54

Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-i206

- MOTOMAN HC30PL6

Max TCP Speed
- AUBO-i202.6 m/s

- MOTOMAN HC30PL3.1 m/s

Robot Weight
- AUBO-i2063.7 kg

- MOTOMAN HC30PL140 kg

Mounting Options
- AUBO-i20Any

- MOTOMAN HC30PLfloor, ceiling, wall

Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-i20CE

- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO/TS 15066

Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-i20software only

- MOTOMAN HC30PLnone

Duty Cycle
- AUBO-i2024 7 continuous

- MOTOMAN HC30PL—

Ease of Use
Setup Time
- AUBO-i20—

- MOTOMAN HC30PL1 hrs

No-Code Capable
- AUBO-i20Yes

- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes

Offline Programming
- AUBO-i20Yes

- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes

Programming Interface
- AUBO-i20proprietary_app

- MOTOMAN HC30PLAUBO SDK

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-i20iso 9283 compatible

- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO 9409-1-A50

Wrist Power Supply
- AUBO-i2024V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V

- MOTOMAN HC30PL—

Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- AUBO-i20Python, C++

- MOTOMAN HC30PL—

ROS Compatible
- AUBO-i20Yes

- MOTOMAN HC30PLNo

Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-i20Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional)

- MOTOMAN HC30PLEtherCAT

Digital Twin Support
- AUBO-i20Yes

- MOTOMAN HC30PL—

Commercial
Price (USD)
- AUBO-i20Contact for quote

- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD

Warranty
- AUBO-i203 yrs

- MOTOMAN HC30PL2 yrs

Lead Time
- AUBO-i20—

- MOTOMAN HC30PL4 wks

![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $50,000–$70,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1,650 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.03 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 5 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 2.6 m/s | 3.1 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 63.7 kg | 140 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | Any | floor, ceiling, wall |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | software only | none |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 24 7 continuous | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | AUBO SDK |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | iso 9283 compatible | ISO 9409-1-A50 |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 24V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | — |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional) | EtherCAT |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $50,000–$70,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | 2 yrs |
| Lead Time (values differ) | — | 4 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUBO-i20 | MOTOMAN HC30PL |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $60,000 |
| Payback period | — | 14.4 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $190,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +317% |
AUBO-i20 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-i20 and MOTOMAN HC30PL?
AUBO-i20 is made by AUBO Robotics, based in CN. MOTOMAN HC30PL is made by Motoman, based in JP.
When were AUBO-i20 and MOTOMAN HC30PL launched?
AUBO-i20 launched in 2015. MOTOMAN HC30PL launched in 2019.
How do AUBO-i20 and MOTOMAN HC30PL compare on the Robo Index?
AUBO-i20 grades AA on the Robo Index. MOTOMAN HC30PL grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of AUBO-i20 compare to MOTOMAN HC30PL?
AUBO-i20 has a reach of 1650 mm. MOTOMAN HC30PL has a reach of 1700 mm.
Are AUBO-i20 and MOTOMAN HC30PL in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-i20 and MOTOMAN HC30PL?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUBO-i20 vs MOTOMAN HC30PL compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.