Aura vs ECO65-6F
Side-by-side comparison of Aura (Comau) and ECO65-6F (RealMan Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AuraItaly
- ECO65-6FChina
Year First Available
- Aura2016
- ECO65-6F—
Verified Deployments
- Aura0 Deployments
- ECO65-6F0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Aura$80,000 USD
- ECO65-6F$6,738–$15,460 USD
Availability Status
- AuraACTIVE
- ECO65-6FACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
IP Rating
- Aura—
- ECO65-6FIP54
Payload
- Aura170 kg
- ECO65-6F5 kg
Reach
- Aura2,800 mm
- ECO65-6F610 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Aura6
- ECO65-6F—
Repeatability
- Aura—
- ECO65-6F±0.05 mm
Robot Weight
- Aura—
- ECO65-6F7.8 kg
Mounting Options
- Auraupside down
- ECO65-6F—
Safety
Safety Rating
- AuraISO/TS 15066
- ECO65-6FISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- AuraYes
- ECO65-6Fnone
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- Aura—
- ECO65-6FYes
Programming Interface
- Aurano_code_gui
- ECO65-6Fopen API
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- Aura—
- ECO65-6FNo
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Aura$80,000 USD
- ECO65-6F$6,738–$15,460 USD
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $80,000 USD | $6,738–$15,460 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 170 kg | 5 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,800 mm | 610 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.05 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 7.8 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | upside down | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating | ISO/TS 15066 | ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | open API |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | — | No |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $80,000 USD | $6,738–$15,460 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Aura | ECO65-6F |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $80,000 | $11,099 |
| Payback period | 19.2 mo | 2.7 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $170,000 | $238,901 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +213% | +2152% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Aura and ECO65-6F?
Aura is made by Comau, based in IT. ECO65-6F is made by RealMan Robotics, based in CN.
How do Aura and ECO65-6F compare on the Robo Index?
Aura grades AAA on the Robo Index. ECO65-6F grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Aura and ECO65-6F in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Aura and ECO65-6F?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Aura vs ECO65-6F compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.