Aura vs Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor
Side-by-side comparison of Aura (Comau) and Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor (Flexiv Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AuraItaly
- Rizon 10 + F/T SensorChina
Year First Available
- Aura2016
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor—
Verified Deployments
- Aura0 Deployments
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Aura$80,000 USD
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor$65,000 USD
Availability Status
- AuraACTIVE
- Rizon 10 + F/T SensorACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Aura170 kg
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor10 kg
Reach
- Aura2,800 mm
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor941 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Aura6
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor7
Repeatability
- Aura—
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor±0.05 mm
Robot Weight
- Aura—
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor39 kg
Mounting Options
- Auraupside down
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor—
Safety
Safety Rating
- AuraISO/TS 15066
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor—
Force/Torque Sensing
- AuraYes
- Rizon 10 + F/T SensorYes
Ease of Use
Programming Interface
- Aurano_code_gui
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Aura$80,000 USD
- Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor$65,000 USD
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $80,000 USD | $65,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 170 kg | 10 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,800 mm | 941 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 7 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.05 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 39 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | upside down | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | — |
| Force/Torque Sensing | Yes | Yes |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $80,000 USD | $65,000 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Aura | Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $80,000 | $65,000 |
| Payback period | 19.2 mo | 15.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $170,000 | $185,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +213% | +285% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Aura and Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor?
Aura is made by Comau, based in IT. Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor is made by Flexiv Ltd., based in CN.
How do Aura and Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor compare on the Robo Index?
Aura grades AAA on the Robo Index. Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Aura compare to Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor?
Aura has a reach of 2800 mm. Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor has a reach of 941 mm.
Are Aura and Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Aura and Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Aura vs Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.