BLDC Φ35 vs GEN72-B
Side-by-side comparison of BLDC Φ35 (엠닉스) and GEN72-B (RealMan Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- BLDC Φ35—
- GEN72-BChina
Year First Available
- BLDC Φ35—
- GEN72-B2024
Verified Deployments
- BLDC Φ350 Deployments
- GEN72-B0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- BLDC Φ35ACTIVE
- GEN72-BACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- BLDC Φ35—
- GEN72-B2 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- BLDC Φ35IP30
- GEN72-BIP54
Reach
- BLDC Φ35—
- GEN72-B600 mm
Repeatability
- BLDC Φ35—
- GEN72-B±1 mm
Max TCP Speed
- BLDC Φ35—
- GEN72-B1.9 m/s
Robot Weight
- BLDC Φ351.3 kg
- GEN72-B6.6 kg
Performance
MTBF
- BLDC Φ35—
- GEN72-B30,000 hrs
Duty Cycle
- BLDC Φ35continuous 24 7
- GEN72-B—
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- BLDC Φ35—
- GEN72-B統合型
End-Effector
Internal Cable Routing
- BLDC Φ35external only
- GEN72-B—
Commercial
Warranty
- BLDC Φ351 yrs
- GEN72-B—
Service Network
- BLDC Φ35global
- GEN72-B—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | 2 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | IP30 | IP54 |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 600 mm |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±1 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 1.9 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 1.3 kg | 6.6 kg |
| Performance | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | — | 30,000 hrs |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | continuous 24 7 | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | — | 統合型 |
| End-Effector | ||
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | external only | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Service Network (values differ) | global | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Degrees of Freedom, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | BLDC Φ35 | GEN72-B |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
BLDC Φ35, GEN72-B have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes BLDC Φ35 and GEN72-B?
BLDC Φ35 is made by 엠닉스. GEN72-B is made by RealMan Robotics, based in CN.
How do BLDC Φ35 and GEN72-B compare on the Robo Score?
BLDC Φ35 scores 36.3 on the Robo Score. GEN72-B scores 72.2. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are BLDC Φ35 and GEN72-B in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between BLDC Φ35 and GEN72-B?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
BLDC Φ35 vs GEN72-B compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.