Side-by-side comparison of Brokk 130⁺ (Brokk Inc.) and MULE ML150 (Construction Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price


Availability Status


Payload Capacity


Reach


Max Speed


Autonomy Level


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Sweden | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $50,000–$85,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 180 kg | 90.7 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 3,700 mm | 3,657.6 mm |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.7 m/s | — |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | — | semi-autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, IP Rating
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Brokk 130⁺ | MULE ML150 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $67,500 |
| Payback period | — | 16.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $182,500 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +270% |
Brokk 130⁺ has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
Brokk 130⁺ is made by Brokk Inc., based in SE. MULE ML150 is made by Construction Robotics, based in US.
Brokk 130⁺ grades A on the Robo Index. MULE ML150 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Construction on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The construction robot vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The construction robot vendor RFP: questions and red flags
10 min readConstruction Robots
A 90-day playbook to run your first robotic task on an active jobsite
8 min readConstruction Robots
Decision framework: is your project robot-ready?
8 min readConstruction Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Brokk 130⁺ vs MULE ML150 compares two robots in the construction category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.