CL-1 vs Darwin-OP
Side-by-side comparison of CL-1 (LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd) and Darwin-OP (ROBOTIS Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- CL-1China
- Darwin-OPSouth Korea
Year First Available
- CL-12024
- Darwin-OP2010
Verified Deployments
- CL-10 Deployments
- Darwin-OP0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- CL-1Research platform
- Darwin-OP$12,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- CL-12 hrs
- Darwin-OP0.5 hrs
Availability Status
- CL-1ACTIVE
- Darwin-OPACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- CL-11640 mm
- Darwin-OP45.72 cm
Weight
- CL-145 kg
- Darwin-OP9.1 kg
Mobility Type
- CL-1bipedal
- Darwin-OPbipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- CL-1full bipedal
- Darwin-OPfull bipedal
Walking Speed
- CL-11.1 m/s
- Darwin-OP0.2 m/s
Stair Climbing
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPNo
Terrain
- CL-1diverse terrain
- Darwin-OPflat indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- CL-125 kg
- Darwin-OP—
Total DOF
- CL-152
- Darwin-OP20
Arm DOF
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OP3
Hand DOF
- CL-15
- Darwin-OP—
Bimanual Coordination
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPNo
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPIntel Atom N2600 @1.6 GHz dual core
VLM Capable
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPNo
Foundation Models
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPfalse
Imitation Learning
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPNo
Programming
- CL-1code_python, proprietary_app
- Darwin-OPcode_python, code_ros
Battery & Power
Runtime
- CL-12 hrs
- Darwin-OP0.5 hrs
Battery Swap
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPNo
Software
SDK Languages
- CL-1code_python, proprietary_app
- Darwin-OPC++
ROS Support
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPYes
Open API
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OPYes
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- CL-1commercial
- Darwin-OPcommercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- CL-1Research platform
- Darwin-OP$12,000 USD
Price Tier
- CL-140-80K
- Darwin-OP10-20K
Pricing Model
- CL-1purchase
- Darwin-OPpurchase
Warranty
- CL-1—
- Darwin-OP1 yrs
Applications
- CL-1hazardous_env, high-end customer service, automotive manufacturing, in-home services
- Darwin-OPeducation, research
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | South Korea |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2010 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Research platform | $12,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 0.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1640 mm | 45.72 cm |
| Weight (values differ) | 45 kg | 9.1 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.1 m/s | 0.2 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | diverse terrain | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | 20 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 5 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Intel Atom N2600 @1.6 GHz dual core |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, proprietary_app | code_python, code_ros |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 0.5 hrs |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | No |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, proprietary_app | C++ |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | commercial | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Research platform | $12,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | hazardous_env, high-end customer service, automotive manufacturing, in-home services | education, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | CL-1 | Darwin-OP |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $12,000 |
| Payback period | — | 2.9 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $238,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +1983% |
CL-1 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes CL-1 and Darwin-OP?
CL-1 is made by LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd, based in CN. Darwin-OP is made by ROBOTIS Co., Ltd., based in KR.
When were CL-1 and Darwin-OP launched?
CL-1 launched in 2024. Darwin-OP launched in 2010.
How do CL-1 and Darwin-OP compare on the Robo Index?
CL-1 grades BBB on the Robo Index. Darwin-OP grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are CL-1 and Darwin-OP in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between CL-1 and Darwin-OP?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
CL-1 vs Darwin-OP compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.