COBOTTA vs MiniCobo
Side-by-side comparison of COBOTTA (DENSO) and MiniCobo (Jaka) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- COBOTTAJapan
- MiniCoboChina
Year First Available
- COBOTTA2017
- MiniCobo2014
Verified Deployments
- COBOTTA0 Deployments
- MiniCobo0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- COBOTTA$14,505–$16,500 USD
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD
Availability Status
- COBOTTAACTIVE
- MiniCoboACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- COBOTTA0.5 kg
- MiniCobo1 kg
Max TCP Speed
- COBOTTA2.5 m/s
- MiniCobo1.5 m/s
IP Rating
- COBOTTAIP54
- MiniCoboIP54
Reach
- COBOTTA342 mm
- MiniCobo580 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- COBOTTA6
- MiniCobo6
Repeatability
- COBOTTA±0.03 mm
- MiniCobo±0.1 mm
Robot Weight
- COBOTTA11 kg
- MiniCobo9.4 kg
Mounting Options
- COBOTTAfloor, ceiling, wall
- MiniCobofloor, ceiling, wall
Safety
Safety Rating
- COBOTTAISO 10218-1:2011, ISO 13849-1:2015, ISO/TS 15066:2016, IEC 60204-1:2016/A1:2021, EN 61000-6-7:2015
- MiniCoboISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- COBOTTAjoint level all
- MiniCobonone
TCP Speed (Collaborative)
- COBOTTA2 m/s
- MiniCobo—
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- COBOTTAYes
- MiniCoboYes
Offline Programming
- COBOTTAYes
- MiniCoboNo
Programming Interface
- COBOTTAteach_pendant, drag_and_drop
- MiniCoboGraphic Programming
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- COBOTTAISO 9409-1-A50
- MiniCoboISO 9409-1-A50
Integrated F/T Sensor
- COBOTTAYes
- MiniCobo—
Wrist Power Supply
- COBOTTA12 V and 24 V
- MiniCobo—
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- COBOTTAYes
- MiniCobo—
Fieldbus Protocols
- COBOTTAEtherCAT, ProfiNET, EtherNet IP
- MiniCoboEtherCAT, Profinet
Commercial
Price (USD)
- COBOTTA$14,505–$16,500 USD
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD
Warranty
- COBOTTA—
- MiniCobo2 yrs
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2017 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $14,505–$16,500 USD | $13,313 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 1 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2.5 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Reach (values differ) | 342 mm | 580 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 11 kg | 9.4 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | floor, ceiling, wall |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO 10218-1:2011, ISO 13849-1:2015, ISO/TS 15066:2016, IEC 60204-1:2016/A1:2021, EN 61000-6-7:2015 | ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | joint level all | none |
| TCP Speed (Collaborative) (values differ) | 2 m/s | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop | Graphic Programming |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard | ISO 9409-1-A50 | ISO 9409-1-A50 |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 12 V and 24 V | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, ProfiNET, EtherNet IP | EtherCAT, Profinet |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $14,505–$16,500 USD | $13,313 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | COBOTTA | MiniCobo |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $15,503 | $13,313 |
| Payback period | 3.7 mo | 3.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $234,498 | $236,688 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1513% | +1778% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes COBOTTA and MiniCobo?
COBOTTA is made by DENSO, based in JP. MiniCobo is made by Jaka, based in CN.
When were COBOTTA and MiniCobo launched?
COBOTTA launched in 2017. MiniCobo launched in 2014.
How do COBOTTA and MiniCobo compare on the Robo Index?
COBOTTA grades A on the Robo Index. MiniCobo grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of COBOTTA compare to MiniCobo?
COBOTTA has a reach of 1066 mm. MiniCobo has a reach of 580 mm.
Are COBOTTA and MiniCobo in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between COBOTTA and MiniCobo?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
COBOTTA vs MiniCobo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.