CUVIS-spine vs Mako Partial Knee

Side-by-side comparison of CUVIS-spine (CUREXO) and Mako Partial Knee (Stryker) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in

View saved

Optimize comparison for buyer

Default Hospitality & F&B Warehousing & Logistics Manufacturing Healthcare & Hospitals Cleaning & Facilities Last-Mile Delivery Agriculture Home & Household

Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

CUVIS-spine36.8

Mako Partial Knee69.7

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

CUVIS-spineSouth Korea
Mako Partial KneeUnited States

Verified Deployments

CUVIS-spine0 Deployments
Mako Partial Knee0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Price

CUVIS-spineContact for quote
Mako Partial Knee$375,000–$550,000 USD

Availability Status

CUVIS-spineACTIVE
Mako Partial KneeACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

	CUVIS-spinesurgical-medicalCUREXO 36.8Robo Score	Mako Partial Kneesurgical-medicalStryker 69.7Robo Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)	South Korea	United States
Verified Deployments	0 Deployments	0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price (values differ)	Contact for quote	$375,000–$550,000 USD
Availability Status	ACTIVE	ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Robots (fleet)

Hours / day

Labor $/hr (USD)

Days / year

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

Metric	CUVIS-spine	Mako Partial Knee
Investment	No price	$462,500
Payback period	—	111.0 mo
Net savings (5 yr)	—	-$212,500
ROI (5 yr)	—	-46%

CUVIS-spine has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes CUVIS-spine and Mako Partial Knee?

CUVIS-spine is made by CUREXO, based in KR. Mako Partial Knee is made by Stryker, based in US.

How do CUVIS-spine and Mako Partial Knee compare on the Robo Score?

CUVIS-spine scores 36.8 on the Robo Score. Mako Partial Knee scores 69.7. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are CUVIS-spine and Mako Partial Knee in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between CUVIS-spine and Mako Partial Knee?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.

Going deeper — picking the right robot

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Other comparisons

About this comparison

CUVIS-spine vs Mako Partial Knee compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.