Skip to content
Claim

da Vinci Xi vs Mako Total Hip

Side-by-side comparison of da Vinci Xi (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) and Mako Total Hip (Stryker) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in
View saved

Optimize comparison for buyer

DefaultHospitality & F&BWarehousing & LogisticsManufacturingHealthcare & HospitalsCleaning & FacilitiesLast-Mile DeliveryAgricultureHome & Household

Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

da Vinci Xi
da Vinci XiAA
Mako Total Hip
Mako Total HipA

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci XiUnited States
  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total HipUnited States

Year First Available

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci Xi2014
  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total Hip—

Verified Deployments

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci Xi0 Deployments
  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total Hip0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Price

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci Xi$1,500,000–$2,500,000 USD
  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total HipContact for quote

Availability Status

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci XiACTIVE
  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total HipACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

Metricda Vinci XiMako Total Hip
Investment$2,000,000No price
Payback period480.0 mo—
Net savings (5 yr)-$1,750,000—
ROI (5 yr)-88%—

Mako Total Hip has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes da Vinci Xi and Mako Total Hip?

da Vinci Xi is made by Intuitive Surgical, Inc., based in US. Mako Total Hip is made by Stryker, based in US.

How do da Vinci Xi and Mako Total Hip compare on the Robo Index?

da Vinci Xi grades AA on the Robo Index. Mako Total Hip grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are da Vinci Xi and Mako Total Hip in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between da Vinci Xi and Mako Total Hip?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.

Going deeper — picking the right robot

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Get updates:

Other comparisons

About this comparison

da Vinci Xi vs Mako Total Hip compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.