Darwin-OP vs XMAN-F1
Side-by-side comparison of Darwin-OP (ROBOTIS Co., Ltd.) and XMAN-F1 (Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Darwin-OPSouth Korea
- XMAN-F1China
Year First Available
- Darwin-OP2010
- XMAN-F12025
Verified Deployments
- Darwin-OP0 Deployments
- XMAN-F10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Darwin-OP$12,000 USD
- XMAN-F1Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Darwin-OP0.5 hrs
- XMAN-F13 hrs
Availability Status
- Darwin-OPACTIVE
- XMAN-F1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Darwin-OP45.72 cm
- XMAN-F1—
Weight
- Darwin-OP9.1 kg
- XMAN-F1—
Mobility Type
- Darwin-OPbipedal
- XMAN-F1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Darwin-OPfull bipedal
- XMAN-F1full bipedal
Walking Speed
- Darwin-OP0.2 m/s
- XMAN-F1—
Stair Climbing
- Darwin-OPNo
- XMAN-F1—
Terrain
- Darwin-OPflat indoor
- XMAN-F1indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- Darwin-OP20
- XMAN-F1—
Arm DOF
- Darwin-OP3
- XMAN-F1—
Bimanual Coordination
- Darwin-OPNo
- XMAN-F1—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Darwin-OPIntel Atom N2600 @1.6 GHz dual core
- XMAN-F1—
VLM Capable
- Darwin-OPNo
- XMAN-F1—
Foundation Models
- Darwin-OPfalse
- XMAN-F1—
Imitation Learning
- Darwin-OPNo
- XMAN-F1—
Programming
- Darwin-OPcode_python, code_ros
- XMAN-F1multimodal interaction
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Darwin-OP0.5 hrs
- XMAN-F13 hrs
Battery Swap
- Darwin-OPNo
- XMAN-F1—
Software
SDK Languages
- Darwin-OPC++
- XMAN-F1multimodal interaction
ROS Support
- Darwin-OPYes
- XMAN-F1—
Open API
- Darwin-OPYes
- XMAN-F1—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Darwin-OPcommercial
- XMAN-F1commercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Darwin-OP$12,000 USD
- XMAN-F1Contact for quote
Price Tier
- Darwin-OP10-20K
- XMAN-F1—
Pricing Model
- Darwin-OPpurchase
- XMAN-F1—
Warranty
- Darwin-OP1 yrs
- XMAN-F1—
Applications
- Darwin-OPeducation, research
- XMAN-F1healthcare, hospitality, performance
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | South Korea | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2010 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $12,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 45.72 cm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 9.1 kg | — |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.2 m/s | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | 20 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | No | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Intel Atom N2600 @1.6 GHz dual core | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | multimodal interaction |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | C++ | multimodal interaction |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | commercial | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $12,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | education, research | healthcare, hospitality, performance |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Darwin-OP | XMAN-F1 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $12,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 2.9 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $238,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1983% | — |
XMAN-F1 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Darwin-OP and XMAN-F1?
Darwin-OP is made by ROBOTIS Co., Ltd., based in KR. XMAN-F1 is made by Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd., based in CN.
When were Darwin-OP and XMAN-F1 launched?
Darwin-OP launched in 2010. XMAN-F1 launched in 2025.
How do Darwin-OP and XMAN-F1 compare on the Robo Index?
Darwin-OP grades AA on the Robo Index. XMAN-F1 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Darwin-OP and XMAN-F1 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Darwin-OP and XMAN-F1?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Darwin-OP vs XMAN-F1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.