eBee vs EVO II Dual 640T V3
Side-by-side comparison of eBee (AgEagle) and EVO II Dual 640T V3 (Autel Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- eBeeUnited States
- EVO II Dual 640T V3China
Year First Available
- eBee2012
- EVO II Dual 640T V32021
Verified Deployments
- eBee0 Deployments
- EVO II Dual 640T V30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- eBee$20,000 USD
- EVO II Dual 640T V3$4,799–$5,299 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- eBee0.9 hrs
- EVO II Dual 640T V30.6 hrs
Availability Status
- eBeeACTIVE
- EVO II Dual 640T V3ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- eBee—
- EVO II Dual 640T V32 kg
Max Speed
- eBee30 m/s
- EVO II Dual 640T V320 m/s
Autonomy Level
- eBeefully autonomous
- EVO II Dual 640T V3fully autonomous
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2012 | 2021 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $20,000 USD | $4,799–$5,299 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 0.9 hrs | 0.6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | 2 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 30 m/s | 20 m/s |
| Autonomy Level | fully autonomous | fully autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, IP Rating
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | eBee | EVO II Dual 640T V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $20,000 | $5,049 |
| Payback period | 4.8 mo | 1.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $230,000 | $244,951 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1150% | +4851% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes eBee and EVO II Dual 640T V3?
eBee is made by AgEagle, based in US. EVO II Dual 640T V3 is made by Autel Robotics, based in CN.
When were eBee and EVO II Dual 640T V3 launched?
eBee launched in 2012. EVO II Dual 640T V3 launched in 2021.
How do eBee and EVO II Dual 640T V3 compare on the Robo Index?
eBee grades AA on the Robo Index. EVO II Dual 640T V3 grades BB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are eBee and EVO II Dual 640T V3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Aerial on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between eBee and EVO II Dual 640T V3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The drone vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The drone vendor RFP: questions and red flags
9 min readAerial & Drone Robots
A 90-day playbook to launch a compliant drone program
8 min readAerial & Drone Robots
A decision framework for choosing a drone platform class
8 min readAerial & Drone Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
eBee vs EVO II Dual 640T V3 compares two robots in the aerial category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.