Side-by-side comparison of Eva (Hanson Robotics) and Luna (LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Arm Reach


Bimanual Coordination


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Programming


Runtime


Human Detection Method


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Open API


Air-Gap Capable


IP Rating


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Warranty


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Hong Kong | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $23,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 167 mm | 160 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 9.5 kg | 54 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.6 kg | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 83 | 27 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 15 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 60 cm | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX | Dual RK3588 (motion + perception) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Intel i7 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | cloud only | — |
| Programming (values differ) | visual_block, code_python | AI task editor (natural language) |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | visual_block, code_python | AI task editor (natural language) |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | IP20 | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $23,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | pre-order | — |
| Warranty | 1 yrs | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | machine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Eva | Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $23,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 5.5 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $227,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +987% | — |
Luna has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
Eva is made by Hanson Robotics, based in HK. Luna is made by LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd, based in CN.
Eva launched in 2014. Luna launched in 2026.
Eva grades AA on the Robo Index. Luna grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Eva carries up to 1.25 kg. Luna carries up to 3 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Eva vs Luna compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.