FieldPrinter 2 vs MULE MZ100
Side-by-side comparison of FieldPrinter 2 (Dusty Robotics) and MULE MZ100 (Construction Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- FieldPrinter 2United States
- MULE MZ100United States
Year First Available
- FieldPrinter 22024
- MULE MZ100—
Verified Deployments
- FieldPrinter 20 Deployments
- MULE MZ1000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- FieldPrinter 2—
- MULE MZ10032 hrs
Availability Status
- FieldPrinter 2ACTIVE
- MULE MZ100ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Reach
- FieldPrinter 2900 mm
- MULE MZ1003,656 mm
Payload Capacity
- FieldPrinter 210 kg
- MULE MZ10045 kg
Max Speed
- FieldPrinter 22.5 m/s
- MULE MZ1000.7 m/s
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | United States | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 32 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 900 mm | 3,656 mm |
| Payload Capacity (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 10 kg | 45 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 2.5 m/s | 0.7 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | FieldPrinter 2 | MULE MZ100 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
FieldPrinter 2, MULE MZ100 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes FieldPrinter 2 and MULE MZ100?
FieldPrinter 2 is made by Dusty Robotics, based in US. MULE MZ100 is made by Construction Robotics, based in US.
How do FieldPrinter 2 and MULE MZ100 compare on the Robo Score?
FieldPrinter 2 scores 50.1 on the Robo Score. MULE MZ100 scores 51.7. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are FieldPrinter 2 and MULE MZ100 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Construction on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between FieldPrinter 2 and MULE MZ100?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The construction robot vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The construction robot vendor RFP: questions and red flags
10 min readConstruction Robots
A 90-day playbook to run your first robotic task on an active jobsite
8 min readConstruction Robots
Decision framework: is your project robot-ready?
8 min readConstruction Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
FieldPrinter 2 vs MULE MZ100 compares two robots in the construction category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.